Search results

I can see what you’re saying and I’m not arguing against it. The strong man is bound and his house is spoiled, after the millennium the strong man returns to his house and compasses the camp of the saints but doesn’t enter the camp of the saints. This would all point to Satan not being able to...

Ok, thanks for responding, I’m not trying to box you into a certain eschatological position. I think most people that believe in a future millennium see Satan as currently not being bound. The binding of Satan seems to coincide with the millennium and the kingdom. I was just trying to see how...

I’m curious here, as a Premill you agree that the kingdom has come and it is spiritual or with in us. Correct me if I’m wrong, but as a Premill you would also see the kingdom coming physically on earth during a future millennium with Satan being bound in that kingdom. What I’m wondering about...

I’m not arguing for the AOD to be the Roman armies, I saying the AOD was a sacrifice made on the altar, similar to what AE4 did.

I agree, it’s spiritual healing. The cross reference is Ezekiel 47:12.

You left out Revelation 22:2 where it says “and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations”. Apparently there will still be a need to be healed in NHNE.

As you know the AOD isn’t specifically described in the scriptures, although the actions of AE4 are often used. We all have to look at other scriptures to draw a conclusion on what the AOD is. Whatever you want to claim the AOD is, I can simply use your own argument and say you are making it...

Whom Satan may devour is an interesting topic. From the internet there are four reasons why lions roar, one website says this 1 scare away intruders 2 send a warning to the pride 3 display dominance 4 locate pride members Another website gives these reasons 1 communication with pride...

I agree with most of what you’re saying, the OT daily sacrifice is a type with the atonement of Christ being the anti-type. The literal daily sacrifice was literally taken away when the veil was torn in 30AD (or 33AD). Those who resumed the OT daily sacrifice after the veil was torn were...

The daily sacrifice comes from Exodus 29:38-44. Exodus 29:38 Now this is that which thou shalt offer upon the altar; two lambs of the first year day by day continually. 39 The one lamb thou shalt offer in the morning; and the other lamb thou shalt offer at even

Right, you bring up a great point. Let’s lay out some facts and take a look at what’s going on. Colossians 2:14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross Hebrews 8:13 In that he saith, A new...

Come on man, you don’t really need a Sunday school 101 lesson do you? If for some reason you think the continuation of the daily sacrifice of the lamb after the veil was torn was not an abomination or that it did not result in desolation then you need to prove that. All evidence points to it...

Take a closer look at Matthew 24:15, when you see the AOD, whoso readeth let him understand. The instructions are that when a person sees the AOD they are to read Daniel, understand it, and then flee based on their understanding of Daniel. Meaning this, prior to the AOD they didn’t understand...

Well I can’t speak for anyone else but I think the AOD was the daily sacrifice being resumed on the altar after the veil was torn.

Yes, Jerusalem was literally surrounded by armies and yes they literally fled. And to add to this yes they literally saw the AOD stand in the holy place.

In Revelation 7:1 the four angels are preventing the wind from blowing on the earth and sea. Revelation 7:2-3 the four angels are told not to hurt the earth or sea. Doesn’t this mean the lack of wind is what’s causing the harm?

In Hebrews 9:28 He appears unto salvation. This is not the coming in judgment.

Yea, the problem is you are trying to make a case for what would be the only place found anywhere where the word is translated the way you see it. I can show multiple times where it could’ve been used the way you say but it never was, a different word was used. The only reason you have to make...

There had to be a “coming” in the first or second century. Let’s take for example Revelation 3:3, the church at Sardis is warned If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee. This statement wasn’t true unless there was...

For anyone reading along that doesn’t know, the LXX or Septuagint was the Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament. Jesus himself quoted from the LXX, it is debatable as to how many times He quoted the LXX and how many times He quoted from the Masoretic Text but no doubt He quoted from...