Search results

Indeed, the mirror has two faces, and one is the devil.

The point of "reconciling all" is to arrive at "all truth" (that is written), not by pitting one scripture against another as has been done now for millennia, but to insist that both and all such scriptures must and do agree. To do this, it is also important to follow the latest guideline given...

#5 Other: In the day (time or event) Adam and Eve ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil mankind entered into death. Thus the need for a Savior and to be born again of the spirit of God. However, what is missing in most people's understanding is that having been created in the...

Many are the usual, but I am not one. Nor do I have an "interpretation." You, on the other hand having a translation, would do well to go back and take to heart what I have written to you.

No, the rest of scripture shows that to have only been rather a statement of potential and what has been made available to all. By the same reasoning, the statement "All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God", does not likewise include Christ.

:( You have not discovered a new woman who died, after which Eve took her place. But you apparently do not know just what it is that you have discovered. But do not be offended. Even so, you have indeed discovered a truth that has not been known to mankind since the beginning. Again, if your...

And here (above) is your own point of error. But it is good, because you make a good point to understand-- not in the way you have understood it, but in truth. All truth. That point is the point of the third day creation of mankind, after which no food is created or offered until the sixth day...

If I may... It doesn't matter, that's not how things work. There are no literary errors by any translation, for-- the words are not literary, but spirit.

Many (including yourself) have indeed added to the scriptures according to their own understanding. In your case, you have simply done the same by your own understanding to develop your own doctrine according to your own rationale. However, it is not that "day" means "a thousand years", but...

I have had such a difficult time explaining the truth of Christ's coming (and return) as being one way from the worldly perspective and another from God's perspective, that I made this image to visualize it: Yes, Jesus came during His own time during the history and times of this world, but...

Surely you have not fully considered the great cloud of witnesses to whom He has already "soon" come in glory, who hearing His knocking at the door did and do even now answer and let Him in to them, which is His gathering of His elect from the four winds and the harvest which began 2,000 years ago.

Thank you -- there is an important distinction here that should be addressed regarding Jesus coming as "the Son of Man" or "King of Kings." It is not commonly understood, but step back and consider that the words of Jesus' statement in Matthew 24:29-31 actually refer to both sides of a two...

Such are the times of this world. Indeed, if we want to know better than we ought to know this world, we will get down in the valleys and explore the ages of detail until our own time too fades into the sunset. But that is just this world, and not the kingdom of God. Why then focus on the...

Your metaphor doesn't work that way, you have it backwards. Light rather shines into darkness, and the moths are destroyed.

So...you believe...this is God taking the direct approach? Well, it's not, but is rather the biggest sting unknown to man and Satan alike.

Careful...even Jesus had to clarify what the scriptures actually said (and even explain His own words to his own apostles), against the inclinations of would-be religious scholars (Priests and Pharisees). The point is, the revelation "all truth" belongs to God alone, while it is foretold that...

"Every eye shall see" by definition, is as broad as all of creation, meaning all of history undone, with "every"one ever born present--not at all possible within the times of this world, but only at its undoing. "Coming in the clouds of heaven" is that very same moment. But it would be wrong to...

If it did not take getting out of one's self to understand the reality of what was said in Acts 1:10-11, I could very well have said it much simpler. The point is...the context is as great as angels talking from heaven across the void to men, saying what could be looked at from the worldly...

The difference is that what is of this world and what is seen is only made manifest for the revelation of Him who makes manifest who is unseen. In other words, we who are created in the image of God see according to images rather than what actually is--because we have only considered all things...

Yes, and that is the point of confusion...because most would take that to mean in the way they saw, not considering it was merely a manifestation of what is otherwise unseen and spiritual. But which is greater, the manifestation or He whom made manifest...and what "like manner" did He make...