Search results

There are no rewards at the GWT as those will be judged by their works and all will be found wanting. nope, unless you are a Rabbi ignoring your own Scriptures :)

Yes, that is the attitude we are to have as His servants rather than... Matthew 7:22 KJVS [22] Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? Braggards. It would help if the...

So how much 'do' do you have to do to become a son of Yah? Here is what I read ... John 1:12 KJVS [12] But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: I won't be at the Great White Throne Judgment for... John 5:24 KJVS [24]...

Are you actually saying that God's Son did not die for our sins? No, I know you aren't saying that. So what are you expressing? He died for all future and past sins but I highly doubt we were there 2000 years ago, killing Him. yes well, I suppose it is more important to let others know that...

I hope you aren't against people considering themselves Christian? Jesus did die for our sins in the manner put forth in the Gospels and explained in the Epistles. What manner were you thinking of?

I didn't mean any offense bb, I was guessing at the meaning of your original response and took my best shot...guess I missed.

Certainly, should I first stir the pot?

Is that your 'dogmatism'? You are only proving my point as Communists and Facists don't have truth. Realize all your statements against "truth" are self defeating, even to say 'love is greater than truth' is self defeating as it puts itself forth as a truth proposition.

Must they be exclusive? The Apostle Paul strikes me as quite dogmatic, yet he had has a living faith.

Depends. If dogmatic certainties = truth, then many martyrs went to their death for such. But if it is a matter of majoring on the minors and other such squabbling, then no, love and unity should prevail.

Your response above is to this original post of mine... To call God's church a harlot is to spit on those whom He shed His blood to purchase... Acts 20:28 KJVS [28] Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the...

what does all this have to do with 'ought I to go to church' (which was my original point)??? Hebrews 10:24-25 (KJV) And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works: Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another...

If you wish to call the Body of Christ a harlot, that is your dime, not mine. Besides, the passage you quoted has nothing to do with going to Church but rather fornication. Maybe you need better teaching than you get on YouTube?

To the question, "Do I have to go to Church", I believe the answer would be 'no, you don't have to go but you ought to go.'.

Ultimately the resistence is futile. (Besides aren't you assuming I hold to TULIP?)

What I meant was even someone like Saul (Paul) resisted for a season kicking against the goads. I.E. dragging implies resistance.

Sure, God's grace can be resisted, that's why God has to 'drag' us to Himself. Left on our own we would head South.

Think again, the word is akin to 'drag'... ἕλκύω STRONG’S NUMBER: g1670 Dictionary Definition g1670. ἑλκύω helkyō; or helko hel'-ko; probably akin to 138; to drag (literally or figuratively): — draw. Compare 1667. AV (8) - draw 8; to draw, drag offmetaph., to draw by inward power, lead, impel

Agreed.

Rather you come to the Father through the Son and His death and resurrection. He is the Door, the rest is man's efforts trying to save themselves. Salvation 101.