Search results

By which people assume faith alone is sufficient. It's not. Scripture says so Only if they believe that works saves them. No one believes that but it's buffoonery to Believe faith alone is sufficient

Dont forget the word works stands alone in James 2: 25. More support for your case that words which appear alone in a sentence means only. Again though even I don't believe that as the next verse tell us, "For just as a body is dead without a spirit, so faith without works is also dead." James...

BTW "Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered his son Isaac at the altar?" (James 2:21) By the standard you have set since the word "works" stands alone therefore that means only works are needed to be saved. Even I don't believe that as the next line tells us, "Thus you...

Again the presumption that you are in possession of the truth. The fact is scriptures EXPLICITLY says we are not saved by faith alone yet you want to foist some nonsensical bs.on me that because the word faith stands alone it s sentence that means it's faith alone that saves. That's not only bad...

Ah there we go, "rightly" understood. That's protestant for, that what I need it to say. You wanted something from Scripture that says, "saved by works". I gave it to you. Now I want you to show me where Scripture says, we are saved my "faith alone" which is what you are claiming Scripture says...

You know what happens when you assume right? Scripture says they are necessary, that why they are necessary. Necessary is not the same as sufficient. Do you understand? It's vitally important to understand the difference if you want to actually know what I believe rather than simply assuming...

You still haven't shown me that we are saved by "faith alone". Your standard is juvenile and you can't even live up to a standard you expect of me. You people always do this crap. However as to "saved by works" "You see then that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone". Now won't...

It's funny it's never you people that don't understand. The words of Scripture are clear, we are saved by works and not faith alone. YOU demanded "lose salvation" when I ask you for "faith alone" you claim I don't understand. What I understand, because I have a functioning brain, is that if...

but his faith was not sufficient if it was it wouldnt have needed completion like James said. Keep dancing cowboy

Please show me "faith alone" in scripture. Oh right, We are saved by works and not FAITH ALONE. This protestant idiocy of "show me the words..." you're not a serious person

Believe without effect? So like faith is completed by works just as James said. So if you believe but choose not to do the work of God then your faith is useless, dead, futile like the fig tree. Excellent

Of course there is lose of salvation. The prodigal son. He was with the Father. He decided to leave the Father. Salvation wasnt unavailable to him he chose against it but came to his senses and returned. Stop with this osas stuff please.

How does one "believe in vain"?

Those aren't the topic of this thread. Start a thread and I'll be happy to discuss them. Your infantile approach to this is fascinating to watch. At least you realize your sola beliefs are drivel. The looney little monk drive so many of you to heresy

Thank you

The first line suggested otherwise as I have never said anything to the contrary so I'm not sure why it was there.

That's not the issue. You believe crap that's not biblical while saying what others believe is "extra biblical". Some people might call that hypocrisy but I just call it stupid.

Lets go slowly...please cite where I ever said faith was not required for salvation. I am begging you to read what I actually wrote and not what you think I wrote. What word have I consistently used with regards to faith. If it's this much of a struggle for you to understand what I'm writing how...

Like sola fire and sola scriptura, nonsensical protestant drivel

You should laugh. I laugh at every one of your posts