Search results

Again, neither Jesus nor His Apostles endorsed or taught that. Also, Romans 13 1Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which is from God. The authorities that exist have been appointed by God. 2Consequently, whoever resists authority is...

So, there was no rebellion against the King?

Objectively, they're in rebellion against God--just as the rebellion against the King was objectively sinful according to Scripture.

Muslims and Jews claim they obey God too. Does their claim mean anything?

No, they don't. If the Founders had acted on Christian morals, they would have SUBMITTED to the King of England as he had been placed there by God.

Jesus and His Apostles all did. Never asked disciples to defend them--the opposite actually John 18:10-11, John 18:36. Don't get your American Patriotism mixed up with Christianity.

Irrelevant.

Romans 3:20 and Romans 7:7--"By the works of the Law no flesh shall be justified in His sight, because by the Law comes the knowledge of sin." Clearly, "works of Law" is "the Law" bringing "knowledge of sin". Precisely what we see going on in Romans 7:7 where the Jew "in the flesh" Romans 7:5...

You believe in an invisible Church--you said the current Pope isn't part of the Church--just like Protestants.

Christ can do nothing apart from the Father.

Christ apportioned them in the same way He apportioned satanic high priests--yeah, He controls everything.

I reject "faith alone".

You don't have a clue. The Epistle to the Galatians dealt with the Judaizing heresy. Sorta like your Bishop (whom you already stated was false--no reason to defend him) telling Shapiro he can be justified by the works of the Law.

Thanks man!

If only we could kiss an antichrist book, affirm DAMNABLE heresy of "you can go to heaven by Torah" and be accursed according to Paul Galatians 1:6-9. Then we'd be in the faith! "Well, that's only PART of the Church"--oh so what happened to the boast that you "all say the same thing"?

"Knowledge of sin" the Jew possesses is contrasted (as "sin like Adam"--transgression) against the sin of the Gentiles. Don't tell me the Gentiles were only guilty of not being circumcised. Lol "Works of Law" apparently means what it sounds like : "good stuff Law tells you to do".

Again there's no proof it's parsed that way. Romans 3:20 and Romans 7:7 are clear.

The phrase "work of the Law" to describe the Spirit writing the Law instead of the content He writes is too apt to be misunderstood for him to use it--it has to refer to the content. Remember Paul is saying the Gentile believers are in no way inferior to the Jewish believers--Jews have...

It's moreso all of it. Romans 2 factors In. Romans 3 is more explicit.

Romans 3:20 "works of the Law... for by the Law comes knowledge of sin" Romans 7:7" I would not have known what it was to covet except the Law said 'do not covet'."