Search results

Wrong. The emphasis must be on doctrine. The doctrine that is practised and preached is what proves if the local church truly is the church of Christ. Not the sign on the meeting house.

I've studied multiple religions and tried to convince myself God does not exist. I've studied multiple denominational doctrines. I've studied the Bible plan of salvation on my own. I came to my own conclusions based on my own study of the Scriptures. You have no right to make stuff up about me...

Quote me teaching a physical building is the church?

All one needs to do is go to Abundant Life Church website like I did. They are Baptist. Calling a church non-denominational doesn't make it non-denominational just like calling yourself the church of Christ doesn't make a church the church in the new testament.

Dan wants to be saved under the old testament crucified next to Jesus. Good luck with that Dan. But Dan didn't ask me to be saved like the rich young ruler, Matthew 19:16-22, - Jesus said unto him why callest Me thou good, but one that is good, but if thou wilt enter into life keep My...

Thanks, So you admit that you do not believe one must keep all of Gods commandments. You proved me correct again. Your religion cherry picks which commandments they say you must keep and the others you dont need to keep. Your religion really is salvation through disobedience. You will never get...

I intentionally left out a Greek scholar from the churches of Christ.

When it's on baptism for the forgiveness of sins, are you kidding?

Can I not be baptized which is a commandment and still have eternal life?

Your arguments are no good. Stop wasting my time. I'm going to stop responding. You have nothing that proves your position. AT Robertson admits both verbs repentance and baptism can in the Greek language relate to the forgiveness of sins. He simp,y does not want them to because he's a Baptist...

Says the man that cherry picks which commandments he says are binding and others that are unnecessary to obey.

Your religion was developed by a bunch of cherry pickers. Acts 9:6.

Conflict of interest. AT was a baptist. He had a doctrine that he tried to insert into Acts 2:38. Consensus of Greek scholars is what you need to have credibility. Quote multiple Greek scholars that are not Baptist Dan. AT Robertson had an agenda. His testimony on this subject would never hold...

Dan the Greek literally will not allow your interpretation. You need to stop thinking you understand Greek when you have no training in that language. They believed in the gospel in verse 37. We know this because the sword of the Spirit pierced their hearts. The sword of the Spirit does not...

Not interested in Bible discussion with folks who have not read the Bible. If you want to know what the Bible teaches I'll teach. Jesus is dead in Acts 1 and 2. Jesus has already ascended into heaven. Wheres your scripture that Acts 2 is not the gospel of Jesus Christ?

Yes I want scripture. We are discussing Bible. Claims must be backed by Scripture.

Jesus on the cross is not responding to the gospel. What did Jesus tell those they must do in response to His gospel. Please don't cherry pick faith verses. Give al, the passages on what Jesus taught one must do in response to His gospel. Matthew 28:18-20.

Wheres your scripture? What's wrong with wanting to be saved? If you think no one has anything to do with their salvation then you need to join the calvinist's. Acts 2:40, - and with many other words did he testify and exhort saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation You think...

Salvation is not based on how many good works one does. Salvation is based on that one cannot live up to Gods standard of righteousness therefore we must be saved by grace. Grace does not cancel out obeying Gods commandments. God saves those who obey Him. But the obedient works we do by...

Are you teaching if you don't love others only believe in the death, burial and ressurection of Christ you will be saved? The gospel is the death, burial and ressurection of Christ, 1Corinthians 15:1-4. But that is not the response to it. Look at Peter's gospel preaching in Acts 2. He preached...