Search results

So, what is it referring to?

My issue is with the error and heresy you have been promoting lately. You cannot address any rebuttals of what you espouse because it is all obviously taught to you by TW and TS.

I repeat because posters avoid. You avoid ad nauseum! Now will you address?

Pick a subject. That is what you do now. Now can you address my posts that you are avoiding like the plague?

The Bible distinguishes between angels and men. They are different. They are distinct. Angels are heavenly beings that are sent on assignment from God to serve His purposes, and protect His servants. They operate in the invisible realm. Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but...

More lies.

What have you not spiritualized? You refused to answer my queries re Jesus.

It must be so frustrating to be left defending the indefensible by your mentors.

More avoidance and ad hominem.

If you think that title is an offence it is not. I believe in past fulfillment and also future fulfillment. I have been called both Preterist and Futurist. It doesn't offend me. Unlike you, I let context speak. You spiritualize everything literal away in Scripture. It is all an elaborate...

Can you not be honest any more? I refer you back to my avoided posts.

The Bible distinguishes between angels and men. They are different. They are distinct. Angels are heavenly beings that are sent on assignment from God to serve His purposes, and protect His servants. They operate in the invisible realm. Eph 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but...

That's the way the politicians operate. They have their talking points.

He is incapable of addressing one point. He can only relay what he has been taught. Knock him off that and he has nothing.

LOL. You are becoming more and more like the Pretribbers with your constant avoidance and ad hominem. You did not answer one single contradiction in your position. You are trolling.

You have totally avoided every point i presented. All you and TS do is push what you have been taught. How about addressing the glaring holes in your thrology

Your theological claims do not make sense if you place the GT at the end: Israel cannot be "led away captive into all nations" after your GT because the end will be there? Jerusalem cannot be trodden down of the Gentiles" because the end will be there? The "times of the Gentiles" must therefore...

This reading does not indicate that the elect are the focus of this tribulation great but that the tribulation would be shortened for their sakes. If the great tribulation goes right up until the Lord’s return, as you argue, then why was it necessary to shorten its duration to facilitate the...

Agreed. They get that from Jack Van Imp. He would do that back in the day. But the texts he presented had nothing to do with what he was claiming.

What is he going to say? He doesn't even have one biblical proof text. Pretrib is an elaborate man-made lie. They cannot defend it. Like I predicted a year and a half ago: Pretrib is dead on these forums. It has been given a decant burial. This is more evidence.