Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    2 Thessalonians 2 is not related to the OD. The "man of sin", i.e. apostate papacy, did not begin to appear until after the restrainer, i.e. imperial Roman empire, was "taken out of the way", circa 476 AD/CE.
  2. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    So his consistent use of "naos" is insufficient qualification?
  3. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    The apostate "mystery of iniquity" was already working when Paul wrote (2 Thessalonians 2:7). Within less than 20 years of the dissolution of the restrainer, imperial Rome, the apostate papal Roman empire had emerged and begun overthrowing kingdoms, beginning with three (Daniel 7:24), the...
  4. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    The ECFs and apologists reveal the identity of the restrainer. So does history. Tertullian (2nd-3rd Century) ON THE RESURRECTION, CHAP. XXIV For the mystery of iniquity doth already work; only he who now hinders must hinder, until he be taken out of the way." What obstacle is there but the...
  5. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    Given that Paul uses "naos" consistently everywhere else, why wouldn't he use it consistently in 2 Thessalonians? And claiming to be God within the Temple of God i.e the Church, is the epitome of deception. What would you call this? “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ...
  6. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    Paul is consistent in his identification of and distinction between the different temples. No other examples of his within Thessalonians, but plenty outside of it. Paul's "naos" temples refer exclusively to NT believers; collectively, the NT Church. Paul's temples: "naos" spiritual: 1...
  7. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    Explain the process by which Jesus went into His body of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in His body.
  8. C

    The fallacy of believing Jesus was talking about the temple of stones on the Mount of Olives

    You forgot this one: :laughing: Matthew 21:12 And Jesus went into His body of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in His body, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,
  9. C

    the beast with seven heads and ten horns - the Roman Empire

    Whom to believe? 1. Daniel, the Holy Spirit who inspired him, and Messiah the Covenant Confirming Prince of Whom he wrote. 2. You Need a hint? :laughing:
  10. C

    the beast with seven heads and ten horns - the Roman Empire

    Daniel 9:27 began in 27 AD with the beginning of Jesus' earthly ministry. Ezekiel 39:9 didn't. :laughing:
  11. C

    the beast with seven heads and ten horns - the Roman Empire

    Sorry, but you've been debunked. :laughing: For those who actually care about recognizing, honoring, and glorifying Messiah the Christ of Calvary, read: Luke 24 25 Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken: 26 Ought not Christ to have...
  12. C

    Rapture Thoughts of Some Early Church Leaders

    Yes, and Jacob was an NT Christian. :laughing:
  13. C

    A recent exchange with a reasoning AI pertaining to Matthew 24:15-30

    What do you disagree with in post 49, and why?
  14. C

    A recent exchange with a reasoning AI pertaining to Matthew 24:15-30

    Seems to possess wisdom and discernment, based virtually exclusively on linguistic structure, syntax, and semantics, without becoming doctrinaire. Must be of the devil. :laughing:
  15. C

    A recent exchange with a reasoning AI pertaining to Matthew 24:15-30

    So does it believe post 22, or post 41, or both, or neither? :laughing:
  16. C

    A recent exchange with a reasoning AI pertaining to Matthew 24:15-30

    This is clearly a gnostic futurist AI, with no "understanding" of physical history, and no "understanding" of physical reality. Ask it if it "knows" that physical Jesus issued a physical warning to physical Judaeans in Matthew 24:16. Ask it if it "knows" that physical Judaeans physically fled...
  17. C

    ISLAM IS NOT THE REVELATION BEAST

    Try to explain the flaw. Shouldn't be hard if it's not nonsense.
  18. C

    ISLAM IS NOT THE REVELATION BEAST

    It is impossible to explain your nonsense, which is why you don't even try. :laughing:
  19. C

    ISLAM IS NOT THE REVELATION BEAST

    In post 175, you explicitly referred to what I quoted, which was Hebrews 8:13, as "flawed scripture". So describe the flaw, whatever the nature of the flaw is. And enlighten us as to who other than you believes that Hebrews 8:13 is flawed.
  20. C

    ISLAM IS NOT THE REVELATION BEAST

    Describe the flaw in inspired inerrant Hebrews 8:13. :laughing: Who other than you believes that Hebrews 8:13 is flawed? :laughing: