Search results

You wrote: Westcott and Hort were mystics, spiritualists, and necromancers. They admitted ( where?) they were heretics. Can you provide original sources for these claims!! Be sure to use the definitions that were attached to these words in the 1880s.

I probably wouldn't send it to churches, but other institutions, like prisons, jails, etc.

It depends on how you define "coming." He comes to the earth at the first coming. He comes in the air for the resurrection (coming ??) of the Church saints. Then his second coming is on the earth again. Depending on your definition of "coming" there are three times Christ comes to the earth and...

I looked through your post and didn't find the word or concept of sins. The sheep and goats are separated at the Second Coming of Christ.

I am afraid that this definition of the sovereign God unfortunately is not correct. What this definition is expressing is Modalism. Modalism taught that there was only one God but three Persons, and this was supposed to be incomprehensible. To fix this, it needs to say something more like: there...

See John 12:32 And I, when I am lifted up from the earth [on the cross], will draw and attract all men [Gentiles as well as Jews] to Myself.

Notice that none of the consequences are eternal. They only affect this life. The only basis for eternal consequences is rejecting God's offer for salvation.

I am not really able to decipher what you're trying to say with this post. your quotes and comments don't seem to offer anything I would deny. If Paul taught it, I believe it.

This post is good support for not seeing the word sin in judgment contexts. Thank you for that.

I fail to see anything of substance in this response.

Show me where it says the unbelievers "will be judged for sins at the GWT."

There are no eternal consequences to personal sin. Sin was paid for at the Cross, nobody will answer for his sins (hence the word sin doesn't appear before any judgment passage, for both believers and unbelievers. See 2 Cor 5 and see that sins were imputed to Christ, not the one who commits...

I would disagree with 2. To say that "by faith in ONLY the death/burial/resurrection ...." fails to acknowledge the many colorful ways the Gospel is given in the New Testament. For example, Paul's presentation of the Gospel to the Philippian jailer was simply "believe in the Lord Jesus and you...

I don't recall saying anything close to that

What do you mean by common reader? Is this a reference to unbelievers, or Christians also? Read Rom 1 to see the pregospel understanding unbelievers have (quote previously) about God and judgment. I am afraid I don't quite follow your questions. Where, for example, do we find a text show that...

Don't mix up truth with interpretation. Every interpretation is the by-product of an interpretive method. Some people use a spiritual interpretation method while others use a literal interpretation method. These two factors will produce an interpretation of a passage quite differently from each...

I seek after Truth, not certainty

The word for 'seek' in Rom 3.11 is a different word than the one used in Acts 17. They are close, but one has a preposition with it, the other does not. I have not done any serious study of this apparent contradiction. Sorry

NET Bible (New English Translation) Luke 1: 1 Now many have undertaken to compile an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, 2 like the accounts passed on to us by those who were eyewitnesses and servants of the word from the beginning. 3 So it seemed good to me as well...

Maybe you could get another 100 on the Ark, but the whole world was destroyed. Remember, God created man to seek after Him. Man knows that there is a God, he is to be worshiped and he will one day give an account to God after death.