Search results

I had decided not to post all this said privately...but then you replied. Maybe it is you who should stop. ScottA Much of what you say and advocate for is not correct. Many people do that--it's not personal to me. But if it is against the truth from God, it is personal to Him. ScottA You...

Sending personal messages, then sharing them publicly. Some may not like that, but I'm okay with it.

Good of you to clarify, but this below sounds like you have already decided about me too.

Matthew, you have just claimed not to have shared anything wrong--like no one (including myself) has ever called you on anything being biblically wrong. And what--you think it strange that I would say you act as if I have never shown you any grace? I have shown you a ton of grace--and even if I...

That's not biblical either Matthew.

God never changes. A plumbline is a plumbline, sometimes swinging with grace and sometimes not. But you know better than to say I have not shown you grace, I have, and plenty. But much of what I say, is not me speaking, and if it is a time to explain or not to explain, that is not my decision...

You may "think" and "believe"--but speak for yourself. Stop lashing out with emotion about things you could not know about another person. Were you there with me, in me? Or is it that you just don't actually believe that God even works that way, even though you have read many give witness of...

No one is mad at you Matthew, but caring and correction...are these not also written of, and should we who are assigned to them by God not do them? You can be alone on an island with what you believe, but Jesus didn't walk on water just for Peter, and His message is unto the ends of the earth...

That is not enough. Ecclesiastes 12:12 And further, my son, be admonished by these. Of making many books there is no end, and much study is wearisome to the flesh.

You are not a "realist" Matthew. What is real is not defined by your understanding of things, or even by any measure of this world or of man.

I'll stop there--it is enough. No, and taking a position that Jesus and his time among us was not for, and spoken of, all times...is grossly not biblical. Thank you for saying "my understanding."

I understand. However, and I think you know this and have even said so, that your position is not necessarily the correct one. Still, in sharing your position, two things are possible: That you encourage some to know that it is okay to be seeing things as you do until if and when you know...

Oh Matthew--God love ya--much of what you write should be preface with "It would see to me..." But the Bride is the Church, and the Church age is not completely fulfilled. As for that "generation" and "great tribulation", "rightly dividing the word of truth" is needed. Jesus stood as one with...

I do hope that you know that is what the Priests and Pharisees believed they were doing too...because it doesn't seem that you do.

Paul gave the term--not as a put-off, but as a promise, a confirmation to those who at the time were waiting and wondering when all things would be fulfilled. In other words, Paul know that his message would require the endurance, the steadfastness to last from what was then only the beginning...

There is a difference between the word to Israel (before salvation came) and the word through Christ, the twelve, and Paul. The promises given to God's people Israel all came with a selective "if"--because they (alone) were to be a light of truth unto all other nations. Hence the difference in...

It is because they considered Jesus to be a fake, thus against God.

To everything there is a season, A time for every purpose under heaven: 2 A time to be born, And a time to die; A time to plant, And a time to pluck what is planted; 3 A time to kill, And a time to heal; A time to break down, And a time to build up; 4 A time to weep, And a time to laugh; A...

Thank you for righting the ship according to the thread topic, and more importantly the spirit nature of God and his word!

Yes, good to be polite...some of it is true. That is why I recommend the Laws and Orders clarification approach.