Search results

I don't mind anyone thinking my point is wrong, but, if I've already answered your point, then, instead of repeating it, as if it had not already been answered, answer the answers that had already been supplied your point. That's how discussions work. I know. The Law shutting every mouth (Ro...

OK, so, I was mistaken in thinking "You think the contexts are going to help prove your point", but not because you thought they would prove my point, but because you do not think along the lines of "proving your point" at all, you're hoping to get a better understanding even if it invalidates...

So, you WEREN'T saying you thought discussing the context would help prove your point? Did you (correctly) think it would prove my point then? Lol I'm not sure why you objected to my having said that. Maybe you can clarify.

1 Co 10 discusses those who were typologically "saved", and what happened to them bc they sinned after typological salvation, in order to teach us who are actually saved in the anti-type.

I'm not sure what this means. Examine away. I want to discuss 1 Co 10. If someone is joining the conversation, and they immediately are veering from 1 Co 10, bringing something else up, without even having addressed the topic, I'm not going to accept that. I also don't want people running...

SALVATION IN THE CONTEXT OF 1 CORINTHIANS 10--and WHAT HAPPENS AFTER YOU ARE SAVED IN THE CONTEXT OF 1 CORINTHIANS 10. The reply I had given was because the person was talking about how salvation can't be earned, and I was denying that my discussion about 1 Corinthians 10 was a denial that...

The title of the thread is The discussion has centered around what I claim 1 Corinthians 10 teaches. That should be sufficient evidence to you that that is the topic, and that you ought to address it, but you don't pay attention to the evidence--as you also do with Scripture, such that you...

The "discussion" is, as has already been noted, about 1 Corinthians 10.

This isn't your thread: address what Paul says about the matter in 1 Corinthians 10. That is the subject of the thread.

You don't know what "works" are. The issue with "works" is that they are "a righteousness of my own"; when someone walks by faith, that is "God's righteousness revealed from faith to faith" (Ro 1:17, 14:5, 23) by which they are justified, and, if they do not reveal God's righteousness by doing...

My point was not that "you must agree", but that you ought to have answered those answers already supplied, and not have brought the same point that had already been answered, as if it had not already been answered. No, Paul teaches that the Law is a type and shadow of things to come--the...

Contrary to your empty accusation, I can quote the passage--and my quoting the passage isn't going to help you. Hebrews 10 38BUT MY RIGHTEOUS ONE SHALL LIVE BY FAITH; AND IF HE SHRINKS BACK, MY SOUL HAS NO PLEASURE IN HIM. Who is the "he"? "My righteous one". That was why I said...

You need to define "gift" as Scripture defines "gift", not as naked (ie, uninformed by Scriptural precedent) "logic" defines it: God "gave" the Jews the land, yet they were to go and "take" the land by conquest (Deut 1:8)--this is in exact keeping with eternal life being a "gift", and with Paul...

Who's being "coy" now? You know it's Hebrews 10--and you know I'm saying "My righteous one" instead of "he", because people have the remarkable and convenient "ability" of "forgetting" the subject.

Would you also say that someone who will never change their mind that homosexuality is an abomination is also "unteachable", or wouldn't you say they simply know something that is so basic and plain that there is no place for changing that view?

This has already been answered in multiple ways: 1a. You apparently do not comprehend that the fact that the Jews were "saved" only in type and shadow, and not "really saved", like we are, is actually a feature, and not a flaw, in Paul's teaching. He knows that what they went through was only a...

No, I look forward to adding to, improving, view that I already have, but it cannot change any more could my view that homosexuaity is an abomination to God.

Discuss when you're ready.

To recap: The Jews' salvation from God's wrath on the unrighteousness in Egypt, which was by the blood of a lamb, was a type and shadow of the reality Christians now enjoy by the blood of Christ, Who is called "our Passover Lamb". The Jews, afterward, were under the cloud (of the Presence)...

Anyway, I'm interested in discussing what 1 Corinthians 10 teaches about the definition of salvation.