Search results

Want me to send it to you, or is the PDF version online good enough?

Because they have nothing to do with one another.

Taking just #1, God did tell their mother. before they were born, that one of them was destined to be Top Dog, and the other was destined to, frankly, be "damned" in his life.

ROTFL, yep, you are definitely steeped in your doctrine. LOL

You would LOVE that full book. It shows how neither side can just say "Yes" or "No" to any of the questions.

Why go back to chapter 18 and mention that when it is clear Agrippa was not one of them, at all?

Acts 26:28 kind of seems to twist the road a little for your simple path. Acts 26:28 King James Version (KJV) 28 Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian. Why would Paul be trying to "persuade" people the way he did if they were already predestined to either...

Nancy, Jesus pretty plainly said The Kingdom was right there with them and in them...…. Yet Satan-Followers managed to murder Him. Don't you ever feel God with you? Still, we want to say that He is helpless in this earth because Satan runs it? Ever wonder WHY Satan was able to murder Jesus...

And the CR's can, just as directly as Dispensationalists do, point to Scriptures that hold their doctrine just as well. As I have said on here many times before, the Bible seems to be written so that people reading it will find the particular, and specific, God they are looking for...

Oh, then you didn't dig deep enough. He also married one of the daughters of that movement's modern leader, Rousas John Rushdoony. As far as money goes, the humorous title was obviously "tongue-in-cheek." He is already very rich, and maintains a site where you can download dozens, if not...

I've read about six of his books. He is one great writer... though a bit verbose. And he has published a ton more... many of which I have also read. I especially enjoyed this short article he wrote: Impeachment Hearings for Kavanaugh Gary North - October 11, 2018 The Democrats are expected...

A very good point for the Calvinistic view, I'd say. But, I want to go read what is between verse 11 and verse 26.

This is what #25 looks like in the book: Question 25: Did Christ Die for All Men? For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life (John 3:16). We have already asked the question about "whosoever...

Well, off to the doctor's.

In truth, much of the book WARNS college students to keep their mouths shut, so that the school administration doesn't expel them just for possessing a copy of this small book.

As I said, "unresearched." Reading things by detractors is far from "researching." I don't agree with a lot of their ideas... and Gary North is a pompous ass and totally arrogant in a lot of ways, but they are probably closer to pleasing God than most of us would ever believe.

I consider you smart, but actually, in holding to the typical unresearched view here, you are WAY off base on this.

You would be surprised at how much contradicting and opposing rationalizations there were for almost ALL those questions.

"Yes, I did." But, as probably would be the case with most people's answers, there are "qualifications" as to how my answer relates to what, specifically, was intended to be asked by the wording "all men."

Well, the way the Calvinist who wrote the book did it is one that I DO NOT approve of. After asking each question, he displayed a usually fairly brief answer some Dispensationalist must have given, sort of "off the cuff"... then he replied to THAT question with his own much longer and deeper...