Search results

You need to stick to the topic. Just make your argument from Scripture. Personal attacks don't help anyone. If you have answers, share them. The fact is you don't have answers, so you're frustrated and you lash out. If you really were humble you would understand this, and not do what you're doing.

I've already addressed this argument: the eternal life is only in His Son (1 Jn 5:11), thus it makes sense that only those who remain in Him (by obeying His twofold law of faith) receive the eternal life/spirit (1 Jn 3:23, 24).

I'm not going to bother, since this isn't Peterlag's thread. You can address the OP if you please. If not, not interested.

I've fasted from food, but drank water. I've fasted from food and water, also.

Because you're ridiculous to me. You keep thinking you're going to make a point against what is clearly taught in Scripture in so many ways. The Bible doesn't say we don't have to keep the Law, it says we're not under the Law--we actually ARE required to keep the righteous requirement of the...

You really don't know anything--every reader can see your lies being debunked in every interaction.

I don't take heed to anything you say. I know what the truth is--you know nothing.

Lol what other Law was Christ supposed to have been born under?

Lol 1. You have no answer for my reasoning I already provided you with. 2. Paul says he's not under the Law, but that he becomes as those under Law when he preaches to them for their sake (1 Co 9:19+).

@mailmandan I don't agree with the arguments you use to arrive at the trust, but the trust itself is not wrong.

The two (bearing fruit and keeping salvation) aren't mutually exclusive. It is technically true that if people don't eat they will die, but, under normal circumstances, people don't sit down to eat thinking they're saving themselves from death--and Jesus says His food is to do God's will. In...

Amen.

I was going to entertain this, but I'm not really interested in unraveling and disproving all of your misconceptions and incorrect definitions--not to say that you don't know God, since He says we know Him because He is merciful, not because we have perfect doctrine (Jer 31:34)--so, carry on.

@mailmandan Irrespective our disagreements, your view's emphasis on God's faithfulness and righteousness is edifying, and is either a or the correct way of viewing things.

I think I would agree with the idea that the method whereby we remain in Christ (in part, by "loving one another"--the second table of the Law of Faith) would be by "walking in our new nature"--as long as that isn't construed as being mutually exclusive with the idea that we "put off the old...

That's already been explained multiple times.

I had so many seemingly unanswerable questions that I had given my all to answer, with fasting, and I could never answer them, but as soon as I started bringing them to God, the answers started being dropped from heaven. So easy. Now I see that I don't have to struggle--it doesn't accomplish...

Moving this reply prayer forum.

You think God will continue supplying His Spirit to people who don't abide in Christ but commit immorality and wrong their brothers? You know I'm telling God's Truth.

I can't recommend taking Scriptural (and otherwise) difficulties to God enough--I studied the Bible in a focused way for many years, and I was left broken by my complete inability to reconcile some of the Scriptures with some of the other Scriptures. I couldn't make them say something coherent...