Search results

Supporting my people is not interfaith.

Jesus was a subject not a citizen. His Kingdom is not of this word because he is making a new one and will return to this world where his first action will be political, an act of war at the Battle of Armageddon.

Yea! I want to learn more about this Detroit Pastor.

That guy was awesome at the inauguration. I would not want to be the pastor who spoke after him.

I've tried to explain that for decades. Use ice cubes in a glass as a demonstration. Get dear in head lights. Propaganda trumps empirical science shows people are not educated but indoctrinated.

Thank God! Pete is the man to turn around our military. I was eagerly awaiting this vote, knowing the Left had their sights on him because they want Woke to stay entrenched in the military, no matter who ill prepared it is for war. A read an article that hoped Pete would rename the department...

This may sound harsh but also necessary ... This is a discussion forum! I'm not going to pray to God about something I don't know anything about dear one. Having said that, I am troubled by your OP. You had a vague argument with your mom and you want someone else to take responsibility to...

Leftists. Majoring in minors. The chief justice of the Supreme Court is not good at swearing in ceremonies. He messed up Obama's so bad, they repeated it in the White House to remove any complaint that Obama never took the actual, precise oath of office. For some reason, you want to blame Trump...

What was the argument about?

<sigh> My clarification didn’t open your mind one little iota, huh? You’d be better off if you stopped imbuing words with Platonist idealism. Many words have different senses. Classic Liberalism= good Leftist Liberalism = bad The Left deliberately uses words to confuse. For instance, would a...

Yes. Semantics seems to be something you trip over time and again. There is Classic Liberal, from the 18th century, which formed the basis of our Constitution of citizen government, individual liberty, protected by federalism by dividing power, and equality in a pluralistic society. Then there...

I don’t have to know all. You adhere to trinitarianism. That’s all I need to know in this thread (regardless of its Platonist ‘form’ or subcategory).

You may not realize your theology is contaminated by Greek ideas, such as 3 in 1 god and the Phoenix, who rises by his own power, from the ashes of death. But most of all, how you hide your ideas. I sure do. From Definition of PLATONIST the philosophy of Plato stressing especially that actual...

Properly identifying your theology as platonist, where you refuse to define terms is neither disrespectful nor a personal attack. I subscribe to Biblical Unitarianism, which is heretical to Christian orthodoxy, and embrace Aristotlean logic and epistemology of John Locke. This is proper...

You claim X but speak a different language, refusing to define your terms. What a joke! What a Platonist joke!

Which form do you subcribe to? And which form of trinitarianism is taught in Scripture?

Yes. I reject your claim that trinitarianism lacks objective definition. However, I understand you wanting to dodge the scrutiny of what is objectively indefensible. Feel free to enlighten me. What are all the different variants of trinitarianism? Objectively define your terms, please and...

Because we are talking about moral absolutes, not moral relativism. Yes. The subject is objective and does not depend on individual perspectives. You are reducing an objective topic to subjective. Suppose the thread topic was life forms at the ocean’s bottom. The answer does not depend on...

There is nothing disrespectful - moral or otherwise - in talking about absolutes. This thread is not about being respectful but trinitarian logic. This exchange shows how you take things personally. By ‘you’ I was not referring to @RLT63 but trinitarians - and I think you know that.

This thread is not about repentance! You are an obstruction because you obstruct discussing soulful needs.