Search results

Ummmmm......NOT TRUE...He nor the Gelasian Decree condemned it. They agree with earlier Church Councils that it should not be part of the Canon (Scripture) sooooo did you even read the link you cited???? I already know that the answer is NO, you didn't read them otherwise you wouldn't have...

Maybe I am misunderstanding you but are you suggesting that Joseph was not a widower?? The Protoevangelium of James says: "Zacharias, Zacharias, go out and assemble the widowers of the people..." and Joseph assembled with them sooooo I may be misunderstanding you. Sooooo like I said, joseph...

Sooooo you think that the Protevangelium of James is the work of satan? Where is your evidence of that? Curious Mary

Got it......You can't debunk the history so you attack the source. Thank you for your time.

Hi DNB, That is a very good question. Since Scripture does not tell us we have to interpret what Scripture says on the matter by using Jewish and Christian history instead of 20th century goggles to figure that out. There are two possible answers. One is in the 1,900 year old historical...

Age of Earth/Mankind Bible Study Thread - Sacred Chronology I could go on and on and on but your dishonesty has been exposed enough.

Matthew 1:20

Lol.....You crack me up. I never accessed Wikipedia for the facts I quoted. BtW....Wikipedia quotes historical sources. Did you know that?

Lol.....no you didn’t use it as a historical source in this post Another question for mormons. You are sooooooooooooooooooo dishonest....that is why I am praying for you even thought you don’t want me to.

Lol....no you didn’t use it as a historical source...Especially on December 6th in post #213. o_Oo_Oo_Oo_Oo_Oo_O

hi Enoch, I know....I know....You and @Pearl and @April_Rose accept the 500 year teaching of Protestantism and reject the 2,000 year teaching of The Church and any Christian historical writing that says they were cousins Which is 1,900 years old. You reject that the word ἀδελφοὶ means...

It has to be an intentional act with no remorse or repentance for it to be unforgiven. Mary

R I G H T....soooo when you used Wikipedia today and twice on December 6th and again on November 26th and 27th 2020 and Multiple times all the way back to November of 2019....I will just stop pointing out your hypocrisy. I didn’t even quote/source Wikipedia and YOU did. Ugggg....I can’t...

Lol.....if it is so clearly stated why have you Protestants been arguing about it for 500 years?

Hi OZ< Doesn’t Matthew 23:2-3 speak of their “barefaced sins”? Mary

Not true but ...that’s ok.

I didn’t quote Wikipedia and I see you have no proof to back up your statement soooooo....

Really? Soooooo I won't be able to find any post from you where you give your interpretation of Scripture.....Oooops,,,,,I mean Gods interpretation of Scripture that you are kindly repeating on this forum? Curious Mary

Well, if you quoted all of my post....instead of the 6 words you quoted.... you would see the "prevailing point".....

Hi Backlit, Sooooo when you said to me "That's not correct." to my statement "Every original Reformer had a man who reformed him and then another man reformed him etc. etc" why are you now agreeing with me "that the reformers certainly disagreed with one another"? Am I correct or not that...