Search results

Oh, really? Not very well then. Jude 1:6 is figurative, also. Do you really think the fallen angels haven't been doing anything the past 2,000 years? You don't understand what it has been accomplishing for almost 2,000 years. Are you aware that in OT times the world was in almost complete...

hlflfhclfh

Was my question too difficult? When Jesus brings the souls of the dead in Christ with Him, do you believe they will be first gathered in heaven and then go with Him from heaven? There is a 100% chance that you are contradicting Paul. It's likely that no one else in the world shares your...

So, you believe that a spirit being like Satan can somehow be literally bound with a literal chain that literally prevents him from doing anything?

So, you allow for the possibility of the great chain being symbolic, but can't allow for Satan's binding itself to be symbolic rather than literal? How does that make any sense?

You showed nothing except for your lack of discernment. You are not differentiating between the body and the soul and spirit. When a believer physically/bodily dies, their soul and spirit go to be with the Lord in heaven. Your false belief in soul sleep prevents you from understanding this. You...

You lack the discernment to be able to tell which is which. Is God the Father's throne that Jesus sits on a literal throne? Scripture says that His throne is heaven. Does Jesus sit on heaven? Yes, go ahead and move right along as you continue to not understand the difference between literal and...

I guess Marylin, being a female and a member of "the new man" makes her transgender or homosexual. Or both. According to her own ridiculously flawed logic, anyway. LOL.

LOL! You can't be for real. This is the most ridiculous post I've ever seen. You've apparently lost your mind. Should I say that you, as a female, being part of the new man seems transgender or even homosexual? LOL! Let us know if you ever want to be taken seriously.

I believe that is a poor translation of that verse and this is a better one... Revelation 13:8 All who live on the earth will worship him, everyone whose name has not been written since the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who has been slaughtered. (NASB) It's the Lamb's...

Great question. Why would there be a need for a chain at all if he was locked and sealed in a literal place? That would make no sense. That's why his binding is clearly symbolic and should not be taken literally as if he was literally bound with a literal chain that completely incapacitates him...

The purpose of this thread is to support Amil and refute Premil, but here you are, an Amil, trying to stir up trouble by bringing up unrelated topics. You are a little child who needs to grow up. Revelation 11:5 And if anyone wants to harm them, fire proceeds from their mouth and devours their...

LOL! You are contradicting yourself and don't even realize it. You rightly point out that the body of Christ is not male or female, but then you try to use the fact that the body of Christ is "the new man" to prove that it can't be the bride of Christ! What?! That's a total contradiction! Since...

You know those verses, which explicitly indicate that Satan is the devil, but you'd rather just ignore them? They clearly show that Satan is the devil. So, why not accept that? Do you instead take those verses out of your Bible? Are you aware that God is able to use the wicked, including Satan...

You are very naive. None of those are literal thrones. Jesus said in Revelation 3:21, "To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.". Do you think God the Father sits on a literal throne? That would mean...

It's fine to have "to be" there because Paul was saying that to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord. That implies that when someone becomes absent from the body (when they physically/bodily die) they (their soul and spirit) immediately are then present with the Lord. We...

I don't need a lesson on what the word "day" can mean, but I've seen people try to relate 2 Peter 3:8 to 2 Peter 3:10 in this way before and it's completely wrong. The duration of the day of the Lord is not in view in 2 Peter 3:8 at all. You are taking the verse completely out of context. You...

LOL! What?! It's clearly impossible to have a reasonable discussion with you, so I'm not going to waste any more of my time. Thanks, anyway.

I already addressed that multiple times. This is hopeless. I'm moving on.

I referenced that verse, too, and she somehow didn't see it when I referenced it, either. Seems to be a case of seeing what she wants to see rather than what is actually there.