Search results

Well that may be your opinion. But you are in error. A false gospel must be brought down.

dear readers. here we have a feeble attempt to try to attack the character of people who believe differently. and he can not even get his facts straight. EG has continually used John's writings and Jesus own words. to disprove water baptism is a part of salvation process.. So Fred. A bit of...

If your going to heaven your saved If your not going to heaven, you are lost, and in sin and need saved. to seperate the two would be a dire mistake

Did you read the fist part of dan 9 or like many just skip that part? Dan 9: 5 we have sinned and committed iniquity, we have done wickedly and rebelled, even by departing from Your precepts and Your judgments. 6 Neither have we heeded Your servants the prophets, who spoke in Your name to our...

Thats not my claim thats the claim of those who State Israel will not be restored. and 70 week prophesy is already fulfilled. And nice try, I never said a word about biology..

then why is the church not living in the land given Israel in peace because she has obeyed God? Why is the church still scattered amongst the nations, which was the punishment for Israel for sinning against God?

No one is claiming this is what it means.. No one is claiming this is what it means No, it is still set in stone.. Because the above to examples is not what it is.

lets just take the defenition in the passage itself. 70 weeks are determined for your people (literally 70 sevens) so each week is for a length of seven years. using this interpretation and keeping in step with the flow. 1 week equals 7 years. there is absolutely no reason to believe...

Here is a great example of replacement theology in basic terms

Your right, it is not in the bible. Neither is the word trinity again, it is the name given to a theology that claims the church replaces Israel hence the term replacement theology I have also heard the term covenant theology

You tell me, Your the one who follows that theology. What promise was given to Israel. that people claim now belongs to the church

then its not the covenant in vs 27 vs 27: Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week hence there is no further discussion

No one knows what the covenant is because it has not confirmed yet. although there are many guesses

No, its for discussing the purpose of water baptism.

Because it is the name given to the theology that states the church replaced Israel. hence the term, replacement theology.

whatever

nothing is replaced. next!

How about this I will humble myself and say I guess you could say Jesus confirmed and ETERNAL covenant with his blood (or more than likely when he was resurrected) if you can humble yourself and admit that the he of vs 27 confirms one covenant for 7 years. as written.

thanks for your view I have yet to see a 7 year covenant, let alone a 7 year covenant in which in the middle of that 7 years. the person who confirmed it broke it. Maybe you can show me one? Yet sacrifice and burnt offering continued for another almost 4 decades. He did not stop it and by...

nope. this is in error Again this is in error The error comes because you are not interpreting the greek word baptizo (to be placed into ) correctly Again, this is in error The recieved the gift, when the HS baptized them into Christ and into his death, no water was involved or infered...