Search results

I am just trying to correct a misunderstanding. and help you learn. If you can not handle being corrected. You need to look at yourself. especially considering you are a staff member, If you can not handle conversation and constructive criticism, well I hope you get the point

Please learn your terminology To baptize is to immerse or to place into. John the baptist baptized Jesus in water To Anoint is to pour on or into The Holy Spirit was poured on or into Christ at his baptism, hence he was anointed with the spirit. Once again, Jesus did not have need of being...

Just trying to help. Your wording was wrong.. did not want other people to think you did not think adultry was sin, but the way you worded it, anyone who did not know you would think that is what you were saying

Again, What sin was not in error? The only sin I saw them accuse of was the sin of adultry. The woman was guilty.. But she was not the only one guilty of sin in this issue, which jesus exposed.

Jesus was never baptized with the spirit. He would baptize with the spirit,, Jesus did not need remission of sin, He was baptized for the same moses washed arron in the river, To announce that he would be the high priest.

Lol Yet you do All you people who teaches works based Gospel Deny it, then attack those who call you out for it, and say they are not listening My friend, we hear you loud and clear. What is worrysome is you can not hear yourself. You deny the very thing you are doing.

I agree But what he said is worrysome. As if the adultry was not sin..

I have the same question as @quietthinker The adultry they exposed was not sin? Since when?

Amen. They tried to trick Jesus, it was a set up. They thought it was a no win situation.. But they were wrong.and jesus put the focus back on them, and they all walked away

lol You have been shown multiple verses in which water baptism is not required. But continue in belief and try to earn your salvation we will continue to trust God.. and Christ, our rock in which we stand

Actually He did not say he would build it on Peter either. He said your Name is peter (Petros - small stone) and on this rock (Petra - Boulder or large stone) I will build my church Peter is not the foundation stone, Christ is, Peter said, you are the christ, the son of the living God" That is...

No I believe what scripture actually says, Not your perverted interpretation of said scripture. I take jesus at his word. WHen he says whoever believes will NEVER PERISH and will live FOREVER (Eternal life) I believe him. He did not mention baptism for a reason, ITS NOT REQUIRED.. The baptism...

These same people were there when Jesus gave the gospel multiple times to themselves and others. and no mention of water baptism anywhere God did not replace physical circumcision with water baptism. No work in the OT saved anyone. everyone in all time is saved by the same thing, the same faith...

What is stupid is you doing what I say you do. then denying it If your going to believe something OWN IT. when you do not OWN it. then you really do not believe it. You claim water baptism is a requirement to be saved, Hence in effect. you are claiming you are saved through water, since water...

Yawn Good day sir. You have given me no reason to come to your view. You have served to only make my faith in the future return of christ and fulfillment of Dan 9 even stronger. for that I thank you

How many times have I said, do you not read? lol. Are yu telling me Daniel was not saved? That there was not a remnant in the OT even in the dispersia that were not lost. And did not sin against God? That they did not repent and believe like Abraham did? In fact, is it not interesting in the...

seriously, you guys are so steeped in antisemitism, you can‘t see this covenant is about the nation of Israel and the temple sacrifice. And has nothing to do with Christ. Thats interesting, considering the blasphemous rebuilt temple in Jesus day which had no bearing on anyone’s salvation and...

Your right it does not Any jew understood that the holy place meant only one place. Be it in Daniels time or in Jesus time. Only in modern times does anyone want to make the holy place mean somethign else.

I was right all along.. You can;t admit that? I never changed my stance on what you said. You are bearing false witness, You should be ashamed of yourself. and you should repent.. I am sick of being falsly accused of doing something I have never done, if you can not be honest, then we have...

How could it be over if much of the things concerning the people of daniel and the HS have yet to be fulfilled? No place in the OT is it mentioned that the messiah will come when he is baptized. No. It is clearly stated that messiah will complete the 69th week, at his introduction. which...