Search results

So funny that you cannot answer questions.

For those legal experts out there who see no issues for appeal, consider this. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/yale-law-professor-shreds-trump-verdict-says-serious-constitutional-problems

Reason says this! I’ve long held the proper order of analysis is: Public policy position. If equal, go to step 2. Resume. Track record of success in implementing above public policies. If equal, go to step 3. Personal integrity. If equal, go to step 4. Like ability. Demonrats attempt to...

Every argument against Trump is a distraction from PUBLIC POLICY. Public policy is the #1 criteria. Everyone knows this. Therefore, the Left tries to compensate for lack of substance with shrill emotion in pretending secondary things matter more. Nationalism. As Americans, that must be our...

Deny your statements that YOU have not seen appeals issues all you want.

You are a joke. Successfully fooling yourself.

No. I will not take your fool's errand to convince you what you've already decided is not the case.

Wrong! "We" have seen tons of appealable issues. It is you, who chose to be blind, who do not "see" them.

It’s been common knowledge for decades. What is becoming increasing clear is that you are less a victim of the propaganda and more complicit with pushing the narrative.

Here is where your understanding of reality is distorted. Most people are aware that courtrooms are the one place you are most likely NOT to hear all the evidence. It’s not that the jury heard evidence the public knows nothing about. Rather, the public is shocked by jury’s verdict only to find...

TLTR Oh boy. Could you simply articulate: 1. Baseline understanding. 2. Correct understanding. And possibly. 3. Why 5,000 baseline understanding is incorrect. 4. Why new interpretation is correct. (Again, in a simple and concise expression) An increasing # of threads seem to not express...

Why are you disregarding the verses in chapter 4 & 5?

Where does this come from specifically? And what is the significance of the claim?

Not an answer to my point of verse 4. Jack, Hebrews 4 & 5 says says is our High Priest. What does a priest do?

Nope. You are denying the text is ambiguous. Anyone can speculate but speculation is no foundation for sound doctrine. By comparison. You have to look at verse 26 through verse 4. Who is ‘he’ in verse 4? Genesis 1:4 New Living Translation 4 And God saw that the light was good. Then he...

No, he did not. Repeating your claim does not make it so. Again, you just deny the 1,000's of times God refered to himself using singular pronouns. What's that all about? Finally, no comment on the vids or Scripture verses? Nice!

I reject the implied premise of your question. No one calls themselves "us" and "our." And the question ignores the 1,000's of times God refers to himself in the singular. Abuse of Language. Can't expect less of you Jack. This is a great video using Scripture to dispell many such appeals to...

Yikes! Make A Blessed Day!

Ritajanice, I'm afraid this post lacks discernment. I've long observed in our society what I call THE PERVERSION OF EQUALITY. Not all claims are equal. And it is proper to show "favoritism" and to properly discriminate those with unequal virtue. A judge properly decides cases along these...

How can you grow as a person or in Christ, if you DON'T take what some people/ members say to you personally? The notion of "don't take it personally" is BS (when what is said is true). The subject is personal! The subject is you. What kind of twisted mind expects themselves to take personal...