Search results

Poisoning The Well. Moving the goal posts. Your opinions are impervious to facts.

LOL. Then what purpose did it serve to issue the gag order?

Many Black people see it everyday for generations. Guess you do not have eyes to see.

That was a fair trial, except; Except … There Was No Crime. Paying someone not to talk is not a crime. Statute Of Limitations Expired. Even if there was a crime. Prosecutorial Abuse of Power/Overcharging. The allegation of business misrepresentations is, at most, a mistake. It should be...

You mean we have the Spirit of God that guides us in all truth but God our Father is to remain a perpetual mystery? I’ll start a separate thread on this.

One of the things that I realized is undeniable is the theological argument. The reason Jesus cannot be God compared to the reason it is claimed he must be. The must be pulls out of the air that by no other means could all the sins of the world be covered. That's it. That's the basis. This is...

Trinitarians must reject context to support their idol.

Acts 2:36 God has made Jesus both Lord and Christ. NOTE: Jesus did not make himself Lord and Christ. Who made Jesus Lord and Christ?

It's human nature. One of the most wrongly held views in Christendom is the notion that we are not to judge others. If one studies, the admonition is to not be a hypocrite, to judge consistently. Having said that, we must be mindful of preliminary or superficial opinions we draw about others...

Agreed.

It was a forgone conclusion. It will be appealed and the judge sanctioned.

Nope. “Jesus” is nowhere to be found in Isaiah 9.

Nope. Supposing so is an egregious abuse of language usage. Subjects of a sentence. Objects of a sentence. Not equal. No rational person would take “I gave the book to him” to mean “I” and “him” are the same person. Now, back to the question. What verse says what you claim?

Preaching?! Is that what you call what you do around here? In short, you do not get it. You have the right to speak but others have the right not to listen. If you want others to listen, it is not a matter of volume or large fonts. You have to get them to consent to hear what you have to say...

Not wanting to turn this Introduction thread into a debate thread. Yet, I want to set the record straight. It is your ungracious proselytizing I oppose. If I were to meet @Pancho Frijoles in person, say as my new neighbor, I would not approach him they way you did electronically. I'd wave and...

Was introduced to @Pancho Frijoles yesterday. He wrote several times to several poster about elaborating in the Interfaith Forum. Turns out, it seems I don't have sufficient privileges to post there. Maybe things changed with the new ownership a couple of years back. Is there a place, besides...

Implying sin is not a human desire?

I do understand a mild correction or qualification , here and there. What I don’t understand is people devoting themselves to the cause of doctrine police, posting again and again in thread after thread. Even threads like this one, that are not about doctrine, somehow get re-framed in right...

Oh, what verse says that?

Agreed. That’s what I did years ago in this case and I affirm, the peace is incredible. We are all on a Spiritual journey and on different points along that journey. Sure, some threads are debate (doctrine) threads. Other threads are personal experience threads, like this one. No need to turn...