Search results

No, he did not. No, you did not. I did not quote Scripture. Since you mention it, you fail to realize Jesus is not even referred to in that chapter. It shows how desperate you are to manufacture "support." Compare to Mark 1:1 Jesus is the son of God. Period. Do you believe Mark 1:1?

The better question is why are you taking offense at what I am saying to you? Deepak Chopra, author of The 7 Spiritual Laws of Success, explained that we are infinite choice makers. If you think about it, whether someone compliments you or offends you, it is still a choice. On the flip side...

I’M trying to reassure you; that it’s OK that you refuse to see. I guess I’m not meeting your standards again. I don’t recall ever offending you but do recall you being offended all the time. Go figure.

Stop in the name of the law or live is written in singular but does mean singular in application. Funny that you just ignore verses that don’t support your view. 1 Cor 11:3. Who is the head of Christ? Not himself.

LOl Through not by. You must be desperate to continue to invoke a known error.

Yet, the verse you cite does not even mention God or his nature. Yet, you ignore other verses that explicitly say there is only one God and his name is YHWH.

Aren’t you adding words to Scripture here? There is only one God, the Father. When Scripture refers to God, as n this case, it is referring to all that he is. ALL that God is, decides who sits next to Jesus. Jesus does not decide. Profound.

All. But it’s OK. There is no smart or perceptive requirement to be saved by Jesus Christ.

Then you are choosing not to see.

@Jack Mark 10:40 40 But it isn't for me to say who will sit at my right side and at my left. This is for God to decide.” Jesus does not decide who sits next to him. Who decides this?

They want a unified country only in their terms without compromise. They want what never was or could be. It’s like dealing with a teenager.

Before Trump, good folks like @RedFan used to hold themselves to the standard of “avoiding the appearance of impropriety.” Now, the power hungry goons say “prove it” - as if they are the accused and the burden of proof is not on them.

The only good commie …

Greek influence of the god Phoenix. Inherently contradictory, like square circles. What is so odd is how they make this IDOL, completely absent from Scripture, the central message. It’s so odd!

In my capacity as an individual who happens to be a Christian, of course forgiveness is required. In my capacity as a citizen who has witnessed my country lower to 3rd world banana republic prosecute political opponents, justice is required. Pay day is coming soon.

Always with you, it is invoking one logical fallacy after another. Where do you get off limiting a rigged trial to only a rigged jury? Appeal to Strawman.

He canpaigned to win his office on “getting Trump.” Might that qualify as more than an assumption of pure political motivation on the side of the New York DA?

Making a martyr out of Trump. Great idea!

Wrong. We are not just Christian’s. We are citizens with duties that come with that, particularly being involved in politics. The absurdity is who is left to publicly serve if not Christian’s? Satanists are better with power?

I read your denial but can’t find your acceptance criteria. Picture a verdict made by jurors taken from Obama’s campaign staff. Are they more likely or less likely to acquit Obama than an otherwise impartial jury? Not sure what qualifies in your head as ‘rigged’ but this was if any trial was...