Search results

Actually it was a pretty easy list to respond to. And, my Bible wasn't translated in the 21 century. Forget your answer concerning Mary in (Luke 1:34). No amount of you twisting it will make it say what you want. Concerning 'firstborn', are there any in Scripture who are called...

Yes, I know what you said, but as I said, there is no proof of that at all. The children listed in (Matt.13:55-56) are not the same of the wife of Clopas. As I said, James the less is not the James in (13:55). And others are listed in (13:55) which are not attributed to the wife of Clopas...

(2 Samuel 6:23) "Therefore Michal the daughter of Saul had no child 'unto' the day of her death." No problem there. She had no child to the day of her death. (Acts 2:34-35) "...Sit thou on my right hand, Until I make thy foes thy footstool." No problem here. Christ is still on His...

I've showed you three verses already. Why do you assume it is not the natural brothers of Christ? Because 'Adelphos' speaks to that also. So, why? Again you have nothing to show any step-children. You just want them there because you dont want Mary to not be a virgin. Which, while...

You said it when you claim that in (Matt. 13:55) James, and Joses and Simon and Judas are not the sons of Mary. Because Mary in this verse is Christs mother. The other verses show no such thing. (Matt.27:56) speaks of Mary Magdelene, Mary the mother of James and Joses, and the mother of...

I have explained it. There is nothing to indicate Joseph had sons of another marriage. Jesus unbelieveing brethren are Jesus brothers, Mary's other sons. 'Adelphos' could mean it is also Jesus unbelieving brothers from Mary. Why doesn't it mean that instead. When that is the normal...

Is Jesus Christ a theory? Stranger

You mean unbelieving brethren. I have explained it. That's right. They can't be cousins. They are His unbelieving brethren. There is nothing to indicate Joseph and Mary had stepchildren. That is just an imagination. This was Jesus mother and unbelieving brethren. The perfectly normal...

I know your glad. You have been fishing for it for a while. The point is it is not necessary because (Matt.12:46-50) proves that Mary had other sons. Let's see. (Matt.13:55-56) says "Is not this the capenter's son? Is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James and Joses, and Simon...

But only His brethren that believe not are the ones with Mary. Thus they have to be of Mary. They can't be uncles, or neighbors or what not. And there is nothing in Scripture to indicate Mary had step children. That is an assumption without any base. (Acts 1:15) is speaking to...

VictoryinJesus You're quite welcome. I have never really thought about the two covenants being right or left. And by 'two' I suppose you mean the Mosaic Covenant (Law) and the New Covenant (Grace). Without a doubt we carry the flesh with us all the way through this life. And whether it...

There is nothing to indicate the 'brethren' are Mary's stepchildren. There is nothing to indicate Mary had step children except your assumption based on 'adelphos'. It could just as easlily mean Mary had children by another man. Poor Joseph. He must have been forced into virginity yet Mary...

I answered your question. Go back and read. I showed you where. It was covererd thoroughly. As I said, I think you did read. And you know you have no leg to stand on. So, you must cry foul. Stranger

That's fine. Quit wasting your time. Stranger

I've told you where the answer is. Don't blame me for your laziness. Or did you read it and see you have nothing more to offer? I'm thinking the latter. Stranger

VictoryinJesus I have been considering your questions. Concerning which side of Jesus was pierced where came out blood and water, I am going at this time with the left side. This is due to the sacrifice of the sheep in (Lev. 1:10-13) There we are told that it would be killed on the northside...

twinc Then you ignore what Scripture says. It says it is "...it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come." (Matt.12:32) Repentance is not allowed here. It is not part of the equation. That is why it's called 'unforgivable'. Stranger

It wasn't just that it is Christ's brethren who were with Mary, it is unbelieving brethren. There would be no reason for unbelievers to be with Mary, unless they were her sons, and His brothers. Yes, you use the word 'Adelphos' so that you can assume. That is all you can do with that word...

I guess I'll just add those two to the list. Stranger

It's not an assumption. The only people who could be 'His brethren who didn't believe' are His brothers, sons of Mary and Joseph. They are with Mary, they are unbelievers. What unbelievers are going to be with Mary and seek to speak to Jesus. You're the one making the assumption. You...