Search results

Congratulations on not being the only one who believes what you do. As if I didn't already know that. I didn't claim otherwise, so you don't have to constantly prove that you're not the only one who believes something. Can you please address the rest of what I said in post 638?

How do you make sense of Luke 21:20-24 being related to 70 AD when you believe that verse 19 relates to the end of this age (it is parallel to Matthew 24:13)?

Jesus never taught dual prophecy, so you should not misrepresent Him like this. Which prophecies exactly in Revelation in relation to the 7 churches do you believe has a dual fulfillment?

LOL. You can't have any worse reading skills than that, so it is your reading skills that have failed. As if the better promises that the covenant is found on aren't part of the new covenant itself? LOL. You will go to any length to twist scripture to make it say what you want it to say. That is...

Yeah, if death isn't destroyed when death is swallowed up in victory, I don't know when else it would be destroyed. Paul was referencing Isaiah 25:8 in 1 Cor 15:54 and John referenced that same verse. Isaiah 25:7 And he will destroy in this mountain the face of the covering cast over all...

1 Thessalonians 5:2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. 3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. 2 Thessalonians 1:7 And to you who...

Can you acknowledge that the Revelation 19 passage doesn't say He goes all the way down to the earth? He will be stepping foot on the new earth, not this earth as we know it. As Peter said, in accordance with the fulfillment of the promise of His second coming we "look for new heavens and a new...

No. A dual fulfillment would mean that, for example, believing that the verses Matthew 24:15-21 were fulfilled in 70 AD and will be fulfilled again in the future. If we allow for things like that then we can make scripture say whatever we want it to say without ever accepting that anything has...

All I know is that we won't be disappointed. It will be better than we can imagine. 1 Corinthians 2:9 However, as it is written: "What no eye has seen, what no ear has heard, and what no human mind has conceived”—the things God has prepared for those who love him...

I don't base my view on reformed theology, so please stop lying.

So, I guess you wouldn't mind me saying that you belong to the dual fulfillment prophecy believers cult.

Something melting does not necessarily result in it being annihilated. Also, it doesn't say the earth will be annihilated, so I think it's just the earth's surface that will be burned up. In my view the earth will be changed similarly to how our bodies will be changed (1 Cor 15:50-54). But, it...

How could I have possibly known you were kidding? I do make it known that you annoy me sometimes, so I wasn't sure if you may have thought I put you on ignore because of it.

You are a stalker sometimes. Not sure what else to call it when you respond to a post of mine with a comment completely unrelated to what I was talking about.

Okay, so do you understand what I'm saying then? There are no dual fulfillments of specific prophecies like, for example, the ones relating only to those churches. But, Jesus also made general statements about what is true for all churches like when He said "He that overcometh shall not be hurt...

He's a Jehovah's Witness. A former JW has told me that the JWs secretly hate Christians, so his comments are not surprising.

Good grief. No, I did not. Why do you lie? I have made it clear that my understanding of dual prophecy is regarding a specific prophecy being fulfilled more than once. Such as the Olivet Discourse or certain parts of the Olivet Discourse. I do NOT believe that. I do not believe any verses...

That relates to the future return of Christ. Tell me how exactly you think the kingdom of God came and was inherited in 70 AD. It's eisegesis, but when did I say that the parable proves Amill? Never. Instead, I'm saying that only the future return of Christ fits what the parable talks about...

Right. Just like he did in Galatians 4:22-31. Agree. But, we will be accused by some of turning all of this into "meaningless mush" by not taking it all literally in a physical sense.

This is like saying that the book of Revelation is just flowery language and actually loses all reality and substance, turns into meaningless mush because of its use of symbolic text. That's nonsense. No one is saying that it's fictional. The symbols represent real things. And not just physical...