Search results

There are similarities between the 70 AD local event and the future global event related to Jesus's coming at the end of this temporal age, so it's not surprising that Jesus would have occasionally said similar things in relation to each event. Jesus twice referred to past events involving...

It's unfortunate that we have to spend time refuting their ECF Misinformation Campaign instead of just sticking to discussing scripture, but it has to be done so that people understand that the early church pre-270 AD did not believe in what modern day Premillennialists teach.

I have never studied the writings of ECFs very closely before, but now that I'm taking a closer look at them, I agree. That is quite clear. And, like you have been saying, that is what Chiliasts believed up until around 270 AD.

It contradicts you saying "Since Jesus is not currently ruling over the nations today, we understand this reference as a future event." and you said that in relation to the man child being caught up to God and God's throne. Do you see Ephesians 1:19-23 as a future event?

I was simply responding to what marks had said. We get off topic in these threads all the time, so it's nothing new. I forgive you. Just try to read what I actually say without reading things into it. You can see in that post that I made no mention of the thousand years at all.

It's unbelievable! Some of the Premills on this forum are just blatant liars with no conscience at all about their lies! I'm concerned for their eternal souls because habitual liars will end up in the lake of fire (Revelation 21:8). He said that Irenaeus mentioned the binding of Satan in his...

I never said that it did. Why can't we just agree on this without you trying to ruin everything by bringing up something that I wasn't even talking about? I don't understand you. I was refuting dispensationalism in that post, not Premill.

Is the following passage in your Bible? Ephesians 1:19 And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power, 20 Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly...

Excellent. Very well said.

It seems that way from what he said there, and, yet, he never said anything about Satan being loosed when the thousand years ended. He clearly didn't believe that Satan's little season would occur after the thousand years because, as I showed, he related the destruction of death in 1 Corinthians...

Irenaeus: Against Heresies (Book III, Chapter 23) 7. For this end did He put enmity between the serpent and the woman and her seed, they keeping it up mutually: He, the sole of whose foot should be bitten, having power also to tread upon the enemy's head; but the other biting, killing, and...

He asked you where you got the info you shared about chapters 31 and 32. Are you unable to comprehend simple questions? Where is your evidence for what you claimed that Irenaeus said in chapters 31 and 32? I don't see any reference to Satan's binding in those chapters. I only see a reference to...

I have no idea where he is getting it from, but he better provide some evidence to back up his claims. Here is all I see in Irenaeus' writings about the binding of Satan and he does not say it occurs when Jesus returns: Against Heresies (Book V, Chapter 21) 3. Who, then, is this Lord God to...

I thought you interpreted scripture according to what is written? Nowhere is what you're saying written in scripture. Nimrod will not be resurrected from the dead. Only God can resurrect the dead and He will not be resurrecting Nimrod from the dead. Why would He do that? It's total nonsense to...

I see it here: https://ia904501.us.archive.org/11/items/SaintIrenaeusAgainstHeresiesComplete/Saint Irenaeus Against Heresies Complete.pdf But, I don't see any reference to Revelation 20:1-2 there, as shepherdsword claimed. I see nothing that says "He shall destroy the wicked one... and bind...

Oh, look, Davy decided to join the Premill circus of lies. You Premills are completely incapable of exegeting scripture, so you resort to LIES about Amill instead. It's a complete desperation move on your part. A clear admission that you have no scripture to refute Amill, so, in your desperation...

No. Did you not read what I said? Apparently not or else you wouldn't have asked me this. We do not yet see all things that will ever exist under His feet even though, as Hebrews 2:8 says, all current things are under His feet. Again, there will be many babies born tomorrow. They are not yet...

Says the man who holds to a Mormon, Jehovah's Witness and Christadelphian view of eschatology. Do you subscribe to other Mormon, Jehovah's Witness and/or Christadelphian doctrines as well?

Agree. It's quite clear which one of you has done your research on this and it's not him. It's strange that he thought a post I made to him a few days back was rude and he basically called me a Satan worshiper because of it, so now he won't talk to me. But, look at his posts! What a hypocrite.

Why do you completely ignore the first 2 sentences in Hebrews 2:8? Hebrews 2:8 Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet. For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him. But now we see not yet all things put under him. Do you deny that...