Search results

Yes, it's a person like you who criticizes others for doing the very thing he does.

Hello? Wake up. You believe that the wicked will all be destroyed at the end of Satan's little season, don't you (Revelation 20:9)? How will they be judged? By being resurrected first. So, that's how that can happen, buddy. Think! LOL. You are so ignorant. No, before we go into the new heavens...

Your interpretation of that passage directly contradicts Revelation 21 and 22 which should make you aware that you are misinterpreting that passage. Resorting to trying to say it doesn't relate to the new heavens and new earth is a case of blatantly twisting scripture to fit your doctrine. Any...

Who told you we can't apply that to our understanding of the the thousand years? And your proof of this is....where? Why can't they be doing it for the same amount of time it takes for Him to judge (if it took place in the realm of time)? How long do you think the judgment will take, anyway...

Nonsense. I can show where Jesus said He would come to dwell in us spiritually. Where does it say that He would come to destroy Jerusalem? This foolish comment shows that you don't even understand my method of interpretation. The context talks about "His field". Since He said the field...

Which I don't. You are so lacking in reading comprehension skills that you can't even tell that I was speaking against that theology. LOL. That's not my claim at all. Please learn how to read.

The order given is Christ's resurrection was first and next in order are those who belong to Christ at His second coming. That His was the first resurrection is confirmed in other verses like this one... Acts 26:23 That Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that should rise...

Yes, it was easy for you to twist the text to fit your doctrine. You're so full of hot air. I have proven that you have terrible reading comprehension repeatedly. Such as you thinking I claimed that all Premills are pre-tribbers, which I never did. Pathetic. This is a baseless claim. As if...

Unlike you, I don't base whether someone is in Christ on whether they agree with my end times doctrine or not. So, I would never stoop to your level and claim that you are not in Christ just because you disagree with my understanding of Revelation 20. Any objective person can see the true...

You are a pathetic liar. Amillennialists do not hate Revelation 20 at all and we actually interpret 2 Peter 3:8 in context. The context of 2 Peter 3:8 is seen in the verse which follows it which shows it is in relation to how long it's taking for the Lord to fulfill the promise of His second...

Awww, are you sad that your attempt to take over the thread failed? Isn't it funny how 2 Amills are arguing about something? It's not as if 2 Premills would ever do that, right? Oh, wait. You and Jerry are Premills. So much for that.

Look in the mirror. You resort to personal insults with almost every post you make, hypocrite. Where did I claim in any way, shape or form that I I believe all Premills are pre-tribbers? NOWHERE, buddy. Stop lying. I only indicated that pre-tribbers are also premills, which is a FACT. But, not...

I will decide what is related or not and I can talk to him and address his nonsense all I want just as you address his comments that you believe are nonsense as well.

So, you can't even address why you are deciding to interpret a prophetic beast one way in one passage and a different way in another passage? That type of inconsistency is evidence to show that you just try to make scripture say whatever you want it to say. You have to resort to petty insults...

There is no basis whatsoever for thinking that there could be sin in the heavenly new Jerusalem in the NHNE. Nowhere is the ushering in of the NHNE described as a process. So, I can't take your view seriously. Why would God change it back to how it used to be? I would compare that to the belief...

I have no idea of what you're talking about. All I know is that the topic of judgment and the timing of it certainly is a viable topic to discuss in this forum and that's all I'm saying.

Oh, really? That's GREAT, Davy. Will you be the first Premill ever to give an interpretation of the passage that makes any sense? Let's see.... LOL. Let's see if you can prove that...(highly UNLIKELY). Oops! Here's your first mistake. You say that the "day of judgment and perdition of ungodly...

Awwww, poor little Davy. He can dish it out, but can't take it. Typical. I never said any such thing, liar. I do not claim that all Premills are dispensationalists. I do not claim that Premillennialism was started in the 1830's. That was pre-trib dispensationalism. That is a lie for which you...

I'm talking to Jerry, buddy. Stay out of it. If you don't agree with him about this, then good for you. I'm addressing what he was saying and asking him what he believes. Clearly, you two don't agree on everything.

Such a foolish comment. No, we do not expect the Messiah to be a military leader who would immediately destroy all of His enemies at His first coming like the Pharisees did. They expected Him to rule like an earthly dictator just like Premills like you do. And He has been reigning since His...