Search results

And why are you interpreting "the world" to be something other than, you know...the world? It doesn't matter when the statement was made. He was talking about something that was going to happen after the cross when the gospel was going to be preached in the world. He knew that by then He would...

It's certainly true of you. I couldn't care less what you think, knowing you have a lot of beliefs all to yourself. Speak for yourself.

I think you're the only one. I've never seen anyone who claimed to believe that other than you. Why do you think that God reveal something like that only to you out of the multitude of Christians over the years who have studied these things? No, that isn't what it says. It says the dead in...

That's what I figured except I referenced Isaiah 34:8 instead of that verse. But, they say the same thing. I addressed this in post 329.

Why would it take any longer than that for Jesus to take out His wrath on His enemies? Of course. The Word of God does NOT say that the 7th seal is directly related to the trumpets and vials. You say that. No. That is not what it says. That is your biased view. Do you understand that John saw...

Yeah, and you alone are the first one to ever interpret it correctly? Do you know how arrogant you sound by basically saying only you interpret the passage correctly and no one else in the world has the past almost 2,000 years? Yes, what you have said does disagree with what is written. You do...

Not the tribulation that occurs before Jesus comes. Of course, I believe there was great tribulation in Jerusalem in 70 AD as well, but that was God's wrath. So, maybe you've seen me talk about that before and you got confused. Anyway, now you know. Yes, it does, but thanks for acknowledging...

That's not what it says. You are horribly butchering the text. In no way, shape or form does Paul talk about Jesus descending from heaven twice in that passage (1 Thess 4:14-17). Instead, he says that before anyone is caught up, the dead in Christ are resurrected first. After they are...

Of course. Do you think I said otherwise? If so, what did I say to make you think that? What are you talking about? Matthew 13:38 The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; Jesus said the field represented the...

LOL. Is there more than one? No. But, even if there was more than one He obviously would have been talking about the next age after this one. No one here is more biased than you are, so this comment means absolutely nothing to me. Plainly, you prove your own bias with this nonsensical claim...

There's no point in quoting NT scripture to him as the NT is meaningless to him. He only accepts the OT and his flawed understanding of it. He thinks he knows the OT better than the NT authors did.

All Amills and some Premills (only post-tribs) believe that we will all be changed to put on bodily immortality when Jesus comes, so to act like only Premills believe that is ignorant.

This is the exact forum to discuss subjects like you referenced. I don't know what he's talking about, but he's wrong. Maybe he forgot what forum he was on.

What kind of questions are these? This is the eschatology forum and his comments and questions are quite valid and relevant here.

Right. But, he thinks some mortal wicked will somehow survive the fire that will come down on the entire earth when He returns (2 Peter 3:10-12) and they will populate the earth for a thousand years. No, that's not possible.

I disagree. Jesus said that people will not marry or die in the age to come, so you are contradicting what He taught. Luke 20:34 Jesus replied, “The people of this age marry and are given in marriage. 35 But those who are considered worthy of taking part in the age to come and in the...

First, do you know what Amillennialists and Premillennialists believe? If not, then it might help if you did some research on that. The belief in one judgment is something Amillennialists believe. So, you share that belief with us. Premillennialists believe in multiple judgments. And "these...

None of that says the seventh seal contains the seven trumpets and vials. Try again. I see each seal as being parallel to each trumpet and vial. I don't see the seven seals occurring, followed by the seven trumpet, followed by the seven vials like you do. Look at the descrition of the seventh...

That does not mean they were required to do so. The old covenant was obsolete, dead and no longer in effect once the veil of the temple was torn in two. That people continued to foolishly keep themselves under the old covenant for some time afterwards is irrelevant in terms of determining when...

He's not Premil, he's Postmil. He claims to be a partial preterist, but is as close to being a full preterist as someone can get without being one.