Search results

What did Pope Innocent 3rd say on the subject of folks reading Scripture? Was it another Pope that prohibited laymen reading Scripture? That's pretty slick there. "We prohibit laymen possessing copies of the Old and New Testament" From the 1200s to the 1800s, Papal leaders openly condemned the...

You can't answer a question with a question. The question was did anyone call Jesus "my Lord and my God" before the resurrection? It's such a simple question, even a trinitarian can answer it - if one is honest. For the record, my approach to this question is to recognize it is an exclamation...

Wow! After just showing you how this is not true, you repeat it. Make a Blessed Day.

Irrelevant to the fact that Jesus said the Father is the only true God. (See Jesus at John 17:3) Why is this not important to you? By relying only on Scripture and plain reason, I am untwisting trinitarian dogma. Can you at least admit that there is no verse that contains the trinity doctrine...

Sure, you did. You can't have it both ways. Them is singular? LOL

The 1C is that you shall have no other gods before me, which necessarily includes the trinitarian god. It's quite painful that you do not realize singular is not tripping-anything.

No, it wasn't but I hoped and prayed it was. I asked for an answer that was not subtle but obvious. Realizing there were demons involved was horrifying. I just thank God he gave me the discernment to see it before I said yes, when I should have said no.

I know you think this is a profound line of questions but I do not. How's that for binary? ;) You are asking a relational questions about things that are not related. For some reason, your orientation is above your pay grade, a timeless God, when your existence if a function of time. So, your...

And that includes Jesus as "we" who are not God.

I saw this and thought, "wow!" Japan launches a contest to urge young people to drink more alcohol. Leaders encourage sin for profit.

God is in heaven and not Earth. So, obviously, his ways are higher than our ways, not of this world.

My scientific approach? You are the one who is simultaneously claiming 'it is finished" AND time actually has no bearing. Answer the question I asked first, even though you deem it inferior to your own.

The question is, why do you not apply this duality - both a figurative and literal aspect - to the "Oneness" extending to literally making us God? Trinitarianism is arbitrary. Some things are arbitrarily figurative, literal or both. It just depends on what it takes to make trinitarianism seem...

Sly, you are. Scripture does not refer to the Father but to God, in his wholeness, in his unitarian nature.

I believe it is very simple. Perhaps the simplicity comes from me being a binary thinker. Is "It is finished" to mean universalism is correct doctrine? Yes No. If yes, then > OSAS is correct doctrine. If no, why not? The simple answer is that it takes action on our part. What? Action takes...

Oy vey! You were saying in some way that we are all the body of Christ. I think you know this "Oneness" is figurative. However, when it comes to the "Oneness" of God and Jesus, you assert it is not figurative but literal.

To properly summarize the OSAS doctrine, we cannot ever forget their ex post facto rationalization; that if anyone does sin in the future, they were never 'really' saved to begin with. This violates hypothesis testing of the scientific method. If a hypothesis is valid, it must have a rejection...

Do you even grasp the distinction between figurative from literal use of language? To invoke the body of a person to figuratively express how we are united, is a far cry from saying we are all literally God.