Search results

What are you babbling about? Are you unable to communicate coherently? I said absolutely nothing about disagreeing with Paul. Where are you coming up with that nonsense? And, why are you using Paul to back up your view, anyway? You don't believe you can trust Paul. I showed you how 1 Cor...

LOL. Are we just going to ask questions back and forth without answering any of them? Should I assume that you have no answers to my questions then since you didn't even attempt to answer them? You also never answer the question of why Matthew and Mark would have failed to record Jesus's answer...

You need to actually read it before trying to tell me what to do. Revelation 10:7 But in the days when the seventh angel is about to sound his trumpet, the mystery of God will be accomplished, just as he announced to his servants the prophets.”for once before trying to tell me what to do. If...

Why are you such a liar? Post-trib was proven at the same time pretrib was refuted in two other very long threads before you created this one. Why are you acting as if post-tribs have not already presented our case? LOL. Give me a break. You are so dishonest.

Not many are here in this thread because we didn't fall for your bait. We already proved post-trib and refuted pretrib extensively in two other threads, but somehow that wasn't enough for you. Clearly, you will not seriously consider anything we say, so don't be dishonest and act otherwise.

Did you not read the threads where pretrib was destroyed and overwhelming evidence was given in favor of post-trib? Pretrib was already destroyed extensively in two other threads (one of which was shut down), which is why he created this thread. He knew pretrib was getting proven wrong in those...

You're not recognizing that Revelation 11 is not all meant to be interpreted in chronological order from beginning to end. Revelation 11:14 picks up where Revelation 9:21 left off because the second woe, which is the sixth trumpet, is described in Revelation 9:13-21 and not in Revelation 10 or...

Now you're saying this after making the argument that Revelation 11:12 can't be referring to the rapture since it doesn't reference a trumpet? It seemed like it mattered to you when you were making that argument. What changed in the 20+ minutes between the time you made that argument and the...

Have you figured out yet what Jesus meant by indicating that fleeing would be difficult for pregnant women and nursing mothers and why it would be difficult in winter or on the Sabbath if He was not speaking in a literal sense? And, have you figured out yet how the disciples could have possibly...

You're not recognizing that the trumpets are not literal trumpets. You continue to interpret literal things symbolically and symbolic things literally. The trumpets symbolically represent voices. Revelation 10:7 But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound...

If you want to be taken seriously about this, then you need to give your understanding of the identity of the four beasts. So, can you please do so? You understand that Daniel 7:11 is referring to the fourth beast, I assume? So, what do "the rest of the beasts" represent then, keeping in mind...

LOL. There are no ways to prove that since Amil doctrine is true. Premil doctrine has been refuted by Amils so many times that I couldn't possibly count them all. Premils deny the truth of so many scriptures, it's ridiculous. They deny that there is a singular HOUR coming when all of the dead...

Your last statement is something amils typically believe, not premils. But, you're too ignorant to even know that.

Why would we admit something that isn't true? You're always thinking something debunks Amil despite the many holes in your own Premil view that you can't get around. Such delusional thinking.

He doesn't like when I call out his dishonest treatment of scripture, but too bad for him. I will continue to do so. It's unacceptable!

He has no choice but to do that in order to deny the truth that Matthew 24:29-31 and 1 Thess 4:14-17 describe the same event. He turns every verse in Matthew 24 into a separate event. He even turns some verses, like Matthew 24:30, into two completely separate events. It's insane. A person can...

LOL. He thinks we are evil. I have indicated to him that I do agree with him on a few things such as his understanding that the 42 months/1260 days/time-times-half a time are not meant to be taken literally, that the mark of the beast is not physical, but spiritual, and things like that. But, he...

If the beast out of the sea isn't a man, then why would the beast out of the earth be a man? There is no consistency in your interpretive approach. I have told you that many times before, but you just don't get that and, apparently, never will. By the way, since you don't believe the beast is a...

It wouldn't make sense only if we agreed with your understanding of what it means for the beast (and Satan) to be in the bottomless pit, but we don't. You never even attempt to look at things from the amil perspective. You try to force your premil perspective onto amil. Well, of course it's not...

Look in the mirror. Did you not read the passage (Rev 6:12-17)? Do I really need to spell it out to you. It describes people hiding from the wrath of the Lamb, but you don't know what I mean by fear? Obviously, it's talking about people fearing for their lives. Do you not think that passage...