Search results

Finally! Someone who gets me.

Much love! I hate that!! :p

IMO, the pivot point is habitual. Yes, I know I still sin but also know it is diminishing as my walk with Christ goes on.

I nominate this for post of the year. It works on so many levels. :D

This is one of the reasons I believe in purgatory. 'God's speed' is closer to ALAP than immediately. Clearly, people die before they are fully sanctified, cup fully cleaned.

The apostle Paul was not addressing the question of this thread, which is Biblically supported gay marriage, where men comprise the Bride and Wife in the marriage to Christ.

I meant 'you' in the plural sense. Many obtuse replies, avoiding the apparent contradictions that keep people from believing.

It is necessary to have marriage?

One advantage to not using the word LORD is that it avoids the pretend confusion with lord. Jesus is a lord among many in the Bible and the lord for his followers. Yet, there is only one LORD God, who is none of these lords.

The Bible, when it speaks of men being a Bride and Wife in a marriage. Haven’t you paid attention to anything I’ve written? These obtuse ‘conversations’ go in circles. Who’s on 1st? Prohibition against homosexuality. What’s on 2nd? Men compromising the Bride and Wife in a marriage. I don’t...

Everything is more than it’s defining characteristic. You cannot tell people to only have sex in marriage then deny marriage involves sex. And men being the bride to another man is gay marriage, confined in Scripture. What do we say to this who don’t believe on this basis?

I meant Symbolically advocate for the SIN of homosexuality?

Not an answer to my question. Moreover, this thread is not about heaven or spirits.

Symbolically advocate for the Sun of homosexuality? There has to be a compelling response to people who don’t believe because of the time and sex contradictions. Given homosexuality is a sin, why symbolically suggest it?

AS IF marriage is for any other reason than sex and life (through time via descendants).

Complete and total departure from reality. The meaning of Elohim has been explained many times. It does not literally mean trinity. It means heavenly being. you cannot believe what you’re saying if there was an ounce of truth to it Hebrews would’ve been trinitarians since thousands of years BC...

Absolutely not! I pray to God, who alone is the Father, in the name of Jesus. Why do you deny 1 Cor 11:3? NOTE: God, in his unitarian nature, is the head of Christ. Why would you worship someone besides God?

Not almost. ;) They have to continue to make such desperate attempts to support their doctrine because the trinity is simply not an explicit teaching in the Bible.

Plain language disproves the trinity again! In the above sentence, God - in his unitarian nature - is the subject of the sentence. The object of the sentence is another being, His Son. Not once does Scripture refer to Jesus as God the Son. Scripture explicitly refers to Jesus as being of God...

You are making the mistake of confusing Christians as trinitarians. If you follow Christ, why do you deny his teaching to pray to the Father alone, to worship the Father alone? Jesus did not teach us to pray to a trinitarian God! I am a Christian who follows Christ, not a 4th century man-made...