Search results

They didn't respond to this when you mentioned it before and I doubt they will now for it makes them look foolish. They cannot acknowledge this great verse - unless they apply they same duality rational they did to John 17:3. Just because Jesus plainly states, "the true worshipers shall worship...

The KJV's most notorious corruption. This is not what this verse says in actuality.

So, by your standard, merely mentioning them makes them a 3-person-1-being God? If so, you must accept we have a 7-being-1 being God @ Rev 1:4. Grace and peace to you from the one who is, who always was, and who is still to come; from the sevenfold Spirit before his throne And at the same time...

Agreed. That is not the point. The point is how do you reconcile the prohibition against homosexuality with men comprising some of the Bride & Wife of Christ?

Figurative language is what you are denying. Explicit language you are also denying. John tells us explicitly in 20:31 that nothing he wrote can be used to support the notion that Jesus is God incarnate because everything he wrote was to support that Jesus is God's Anointed.

This is one reason I like the VOICE translation; it makes explicit who is doing the talking. It is Jehovah or the LORD or God speaking. What I find strange is the absence of comma's: Ex 20:5 ESV: I the LORD your God am a jealous God In modern English would be I, the LORD your God, am a...

Agreed. Well said.

Because we see the hierarchical relationship in 1 Cor 11:3 - with no mention of the HS, etc.

LOL See how trinitarians are forced to rely on vague verses to support your doctrine? I believe completely Jesus is the ‘He’ who he explicitly said he was at Mark 14:61-62, ‘I am’ to the question of being not God incarnate but God’s Anointed, the Liberating King,the Son of the Blessed One...

No, it wasn’t. Proof is you doubling down on it below. Well, since your view is a minority on Earth you should question it based on your own logic of appealing to majority.

No. It's just that trinitarians assert singular pronouns refer to 3.

There was already a brilliant analysis posted in this thread of agency. I suggest you read it. If I use my sister's key, that does not make me my sister. This is the absurd rationalization trinitarians must adopt to work around the fact that the trinity is not in the Bible. There simply is no...

100% Contradiction. Duality "also" is the basis of trinitarianism. John 20:31 clearly states that nothing in his Gospel can be used to prove that Jesus is God as all of his Gospel is to prove something else; namely, that Jesus is the Son of God. But there is that temptation to appeal to...

So, our Savior was attempting to deceive us when he said not all who call him Lord will be saved but only those who obey? Milk. The meat is that salvation comes with a price - such as not bashing churches. Ephesians 4:29.

Even using your numbers, Christianity is not a majority. Using your logic, Christianity cannot be right either. Funny how you ignore the flaw in your logic.

This is not the trinity doctrine and the trinity is nowhere found in this verse. Desperate try but we both know you got nothing and must reach to ‘support’ you doctrine.

The Apostles forgave sins. Does that make them God?

Praying for you and your friend.

Milk. No one ever said our hope was anything else but our savior. Meat. We have the burden to die daily for Christ. It means sanctification is the price we pay once we are saved, to abandon the old, sinful life. Jesus did not die so we could remain untransformed. What did our savior save us...

The trinity is not in the Bible.