Search results

That was until they realized they should instead be looking for "a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God" and not men. They realized they should be looking for "a better country, that is, an heavenly". Hebrews 11:8 By faith Abraham, when he was called to go out into a...

Wrong. A generation is not the average life span of a person (otherwise in the days up to Noah's time generations would've been 500 or more years long, which is ridiculous), but rather is the time period during which someone becomes an adult and then has their own children which spawns another...

Just give me an estimate. Months? A year? More? I see no indication of a time period occurring between verse 29 and 30.

That's what we all believe. Saying that proves nothing. No, I do not. I reject your intrerpretations of the words of the Lord. I do NOT reject scripture and it is foolish for you to say so. I already addressed this. Do you have a reading comprehension problem? The few left are believers who...

You have so much trouble giving answers to straightforward questions. I'll ask again. How long of a time period do you believe there is between Matthew 24:29 and Matthew 24:30?

I reject your interpretations of some scripture. Are you kidding me here? How in the world do you see any mortals surviving this? You are not being honest here. 2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise...

Who do I have being replaced in my doctrine? No one. I don't have the nation of Israel being replaced. My view has Gentile believers being joined with Israelite believers together as one body of Christ and has Gentile believers being fellow citizens and fellow heirs with Israelite believers of...

All you have left to do at this point is lie. You literally have nothing else to offer but false teaching. Amils do NOT think we have replaced Israel. We, the church (Christians), are Spiritual Israel (the Israel of God - Gal 6:15-16) and are a separate entity from the nation of Israel, which we...

LOL. A generation is not 70 years. Once it doesn't happen in 2037 then you will add even more years to "the fig tree generation". This nonsense can't be taken seriously.

Your made up fairy tale proves nothing. No one knows the day or hour of His coming, so it is baseless to act like He has to come on the last day of the 6,000th year of history. That is total nonsense. And there is no future 1,000 year reign of Christ on the earth. Also, you are completely...

Where is there any indication in Matthew 24:29-31 that everything described there doesn't happen on the same day? Nowhere. Your understanding is in ERROR. Your belief contradicts much scripture. Once the "tribulation of those days" is over then it will be time for Jesus return. Why would there...

I don't reject any scripture. That is a lie. NT scripture tells us the the ones who survive are Christians whose bodies are changed to be immortal when He returns. You are rejecting 2 Peter 3:10-12 which does not allow for any mortal survivors of His return. Why are you pitting scripture...

What is your excuse for your ignorance? Many does not mean many, but not all. Look up the Hebrew word for yourself. Are you afraid to do that? You are trying to force a definition on the Hebrew word raḇ (Strong's H727 - translated as "many" in Daniel 12:2) that doesn't exist. Here are a few...

I'm asking you if you believe Matthew 24:29 is a description of the same event as Revelation 6:12-17? If so, when do you believe Matthew 24:29 will happen? It indicates that it will happen "immediately after the tribulation of those days" on the day that Jesus comes again, gathers the elect and...

The ones who survive are believers whose bodies will be changed to be immortal. Peter does not allow for any survivors in what he describes in 2 Peter 3:10-12. He indicates that the entire earth will be burned up and it will result in the new earth where righteousness dwells. What are you...

I see premils try to claim that Daniel 12:2 speaks of many, but not all of the dead being resurrected at that time. Then I show them that the Hebrew word translated as many (rab) does not mean "many, but not all" by showing verses where the word is used to refer to all of something, the number...

LOL. Your doctrine is nothing but sensationalistic nonsense. If you actually read what Jesus said about wars, earthquakes and such He said those things will happen, but will not indicate that the end is near. But, here you are acting as if those things are what indicate the end is near, directly...

LOL. Ridiculous. You're making a complete fool of yourself and that's your own fault. You have done less than NOTHING to refute Amil. This is all you could come up with because you can't refute any of my points. That is obvious. You're all talk and no substance. Your interpretations are a joke...

What I don't get is why you won't answer any of my questions? You're not willing to ever address any challenges to your view or answer any questions for clarification of your view? Do you believe that Matthew 24:29 is speaking of the same event as Revelation 6:12-17 or not? Is Revelation...

That's exactly what I'm saying. Do you read my posts? But, what Peter makes clear is that it will be a renewed earth, which is called the new earth. We will inherit that for eternity when Christ returns. The whole earth will be burned up on that day and renewed. No mortals will survive it to...