Search results

You conveniently ignored this for some reason: Mark 13:27 And then shall he send his angels, and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven. You seem to have trouble being honest. Why is that? Am I supposed to...

You acted like you knew exactly what the beast is. Saying it's a kingdom does not indicate exactly what you think it is. Which kingdom? Look at how many times I've responded to you. And you have the gall to tell me this? Not specifically like in the book of Revelation, but so what? Paul was...

Remember, we're talking about John 5:28-29. Where do you read that here: John 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, 29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done...

Very good! I'm surprised you could figure that out. But, I'm asking you to be specific. What kingdom is it? Or does it represent more than just one kingdom historically?

Answer my question, please. Do you believe that Paul was inspired by the Holy Spirit of God when he wrote his letters? Yes or no?

You do not! Don't lie! Read word for word, it says that a singular hour is coming when ALL of the dead will be resurrected. You do NOT believe that.

Does it now? Tell me exactly what the beast represents. Don't tell me its seven heads are seven mountains and things like that. I'm not asking that. I'm asking you to tell me exactly what you think the beast is. Did you not get the memo from the rest of the New Testament which says that Christ...

What in the world are you saying here? Do you not believe that Paul was inspired by the Holy Spirit of God when he wrote his letters? This discussion is getting to be more disturbing as it goes on. I'm starting to have very serious questions about you and the way you look at the word of God...

This is rich coming from you. You don't read the following word for word, so stop being hypocritical. John 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, 29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of...

No, we shouldn't and I didn't say that. You are always arguing with your straw man which is a huge waste of time. I said this: "I'm not saying you think that way, I'm saying it can lead some to think that way". Can you see that? Do you understand what I'm saying there? Why do you take offense...

Was it too much trouble for you to copy and paste what he said to show me? Why do you make things up? What do you think that says about you? Here is what he said: Where did he say anything here to indicate that those who believe in pre-trib are not saved? You said "Hey man he used the term...

That's a baseless belief. If this was true, then why did God have Paul write about half of the New Testament instead of John? If you think Paul and even we here can't know what Christ knows, then why did He say this: John 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will...

I don't interpret Revelation 20 the way you do, but I believe it is all true just as much as you do. All of it. I just don't interpret it the way you do. Look, you come up with some of the most ridiculous comments I've ever seen in my life and you are questioning what I believe? Get serious...

The number of times something is mentioned does not determine whether it is symbolic or literal. Should we think that the beast is a literal beast with seven literal heads and ten literal horns since the beast is mentioned 32 times in the book?

LOL. I am not calling the scripture nonsense and you know it. I'm calling your interpretation of it nonsense.

LOL! Are you kidding me here? You can't possibly be serious. Do you actually think those whose names are not written in the book of life and will be cast into the lake of fire are saved believers? When are you going to reveal that you're playing a big joke on me here? Hopefully soon because I...

No, because that is what Jesus taught. It's ridiculous to think that Jesus was talking about some other event in John 5:28-29 when both the saved and lost would be resurrected than the event described in Daniel 12:2 that has both saved and lost people being resurrected. And it's not as if Paul...

Because they're not literally 1000 years apart and you are not accepting that the first resurrection was Christ's resurrection as specifically taught in verses like Acts 26:23 and 1 Corinthians 15:20. The thousand years is symbolic for a long time. There is actually more than 1,000 years between...

You think anyone who falls away is not an unbeliever? What is your understanding of this passage: 2 Thess 2:1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, 2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit...

But, they are not Christians, right? That's the point. Christians will not be resurrected "unto shame and everlasting contempt" and to "damnation". Are you still believing that nonsense or are you getting my point now? Are you unteachable or are you willing to learn something?