Search results

Do you think that Paul wasn't aware of what Jesus taught in John 5:28-29, which is that there is a coming hour/time when all of the dead, saved and lost, will be resurrected? How does that line up with your interpretation of Revelation 20? Are you going to now have the gall to say that even...

This is an absolutely ludicrous argument. The dumbest argument I've ever seen in my life. Nothing you're saying indicates that Paul didn't know all there is to know about the resurrection of the dead. This is pathetic. An absolute desperate attempt to discredit Paul in order to keep your...

He only wrote about the resurrection of believers which is the context of 1 Corinthians 15:22-23. But, as an Amil, I believe the resurrection of believers and unbelievers will happen on the same day, as Jesus taught here: John 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all...

Paul certainly knew a lot more than you think he did. You are embarrassing yourself with this nonsense. There is no basis whatsoever for thinking that Paul, who was inspired by the Holy Spirit who knows all things, was lacking at all in his understanding of the resurrection of the dead.

This is irrelevant and you know it. Why did Paul need to be instructed to write a book of prophecy in order to be given a prophecy? This is utter nonsense. Your arguments are weak, invalid and desperate.

What does that mean? 1 Corinthians 1:14 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius; 15 Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name. 16 And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other. He didn't regret baptizing...

LOL! You are coming up with the most ridiculous arguments I've ever seen, and that's saying something. Paul was inspired by the Holy Spirit, who knows all things, to write about Bible prophecy. And the Holy Spirit doesn't miss any details or make any mistakes. Keep digging the hole even deeper...

He was obviously called to do both even if his primary mission was to preach the gospel. As everyone except you knows. Did he baptize exactly the way it was supposed to be done? He did, right? And so it is with prophecy. He wasn't lacking in knowledge about Christ's second coming and the...

LOL. It doesn't get any more ridiculous than this. So, you're saying 1 Corinthians 15:20-23 isn't a prophecy. Wow. Well, thank you for showing the world that no one should believe anything you say and that you are completely biased. Good to know.

Revelation 18:1 And after these things I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was lightened with his glory. 2 And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of...

A clarification in terms is needed here. When it comes to "the day of the Lord" that Paul wrote about in 1 Thess 4:13-5:11 and that Peter wrote about in 2 Peter 3:3-13, it refers to the day Jesus returns. Peter called the time since Jesus's resurrection "the last days" (Acts 2:16-21) and John...

He knew everything about the resurrection of the dead. It says a lot when you need to resort to trying to say that Paul didn't fully know what he was talking about in relation to the resurrection of the dead. He most certainly did and there's no reason to think otherwise. All believers look...

Absolutely. He doesn't even attempt to address your arguments, which, in my view, is an admission that he knows your arguments are correct and he has no answer for them. And he's too prideful to admit it. He cares more about showing off his erroneous charts than about the truth taught in scripture.

And where is your proof to back this up?

Haha. Yeah, if they were dispensational futurists, they would have all stayed behind waiting for God to take them away and they would have all been killed or taken prisoner. Thank God they were not dispensational futurists and took Jesus seriously and did what He told them to do.

For a little while maybe and then it gets old. Especially since I'm primarily here to discuss scripture, which is no joke. Maybe there's a different forum where we can trade jokes back and forth. I have some good, clean ones. I have asked for clarification and you just repeat the same things...

Babylon is the mother of ALL harlots (Revelation 17:5), of which Israel was one. It is the spiritual opposite of New Jerusalem. It is "the hold of EVERY foul spirit, and a cage of EVERY unclean and hateful bird." (Revelation 18:4).

You jealous, bro? LOL. Take it easy, dude. My goodness. Can we please both stop wasting our time with this kind of nonsense? I think we can. Let's at least try. Can you explain your view without the insults like saying post-tribbers are represented by the ones Paul says are asleep in 1 Thess 5...

Yes, that would be awesome. I'm with you there. Not for me, anyway. Well, I believe I am a teacher and that's partly why I'm here (also here to fellowship and learn). Do you imagine you haven't gotten hostile at all? Come on now. I guess you know how to push my buttons. I admit that I don't...