Search results

I am not claiming that there is any gap in the 70 week prophecy. You assume wrongly that the destruction of the city and the sanctuary has to occur during the 70 weeks, but there's nothing which says that. The things that are specifically said to occur within the 70 weeks are listed in Daniel...

That is not what I was doing, so this is yet another lie from you. Your lies are really adding up at this point. I was making a point to make you think. Since the heads and horns of the beast are not literal, why should we think the reference to his body is literal? The beast is a symbolic...

Right. So, you shouldn't accuse others who disagree with you about that verse of being dishonest, right? Maybe you should take the word "dishonest" out of the title of that thread and out of any posts you made in that thread. Of course. Doug is the furthest thing from a preterist as someone can...

No, he does not believe that. I know that for a fact. I know what he believes and he believes that Matthew 24:30 is about the future second coming of Christ. He has indicated as such MANY times. How you have missed that is beyond me, but you have. So, stop making false accusations about his beliefs.

I'm saying Jesus was cut off in the middle of the week and that was part of what confirmed the new covenant along with the preaching of the gospel first to Israel in the second half of the 70th week. I've already explained this multiple times so I shouldn't have to spell all this out every time...

I never said you didn't try to show me what you believe. Are you paranoid? You obviously have shown me what you believe and I disagree with it. Deal with it and accept that instead of whining about it. We're repeating ourselves at this point. I don't mind ending the conversation. It is boring...

That is a flat out lie and you are a liar. If I didn't let scripture interpret itself, I wouldn't be an amillennialist. Why are you acting as if John 2:19-22 is part of the Olivet Discourse? It's not. So, it has a different context. Mark 13:1 And as he went out of the temple, one of his...

Again, no one is claiming that Jesus confirmed the new covenant for only 1 week (7 years). Do you seriously think that anyone is claiming that? Why are you wasting your time making these straw man arguments? What many of us believe is that Jesus confirmed the eternal new covenant during the 70th...

No one is claiming that the new covenant that Jesus confirmed with His blood was a 7 year covenant. So, you're making a straw man argument here. What is being claimed is that the eternal new covenant was confirmed and established during the 70th week.

It doesn't say "at" the 69th week, it says "after" the 69th week the Messiah would be cut off. Which places the timing of Him being cut off during the 70th week. Discerning Christians should immediately see the reference to the Messiah being cut off and make a connection to this verse: Isaiah...

The point still stands. What he saw and heard in heaven were things that the Holy Spirit already knew when inspiring Paul to write what he did in 1 Corinthians 15. So, unlike most premils, you believe Christians will be present at the Great White Throne judgment. That's interesting. What would...

I look forward to seeing whatever it is that you have to share that undeniably proves pretrib false. Forgive me for having a little bit of doubt as to whether or not you are correct that it 100% undeniably proves it since that is what you thought you were doing in that other thread and you now...

The beast is also said to have seven heads and ten horns. Are we supposed to take that literally, too? Do you think the beast has seven literal heads and ten literal horns? You would have to take that literally in order to be consistent.

You continue to lie about what I believe. Do you know that lying is a sin? I cannot believe how many people on this forum have no conscience about lying. Not once have I denied what the passage you quoted says. So, don't act like I have. Don't try to equate me with the Pharisees. That is...

Yes, I believe Jesus confirmed the new covenant in the middle of the 70th week. I've said that many times.

It has been explained to you many times before by multiple people. Jesus, the Messiah, was cut off/killed in the middle of the 70th week. The gospel then went out first to Jerusalem and the rest of Israel during the second half of the week. That completed the 70th week because the prophecy...

Do you think that all prophecy is meant to be taken literally? Have you ever read the book of Daniel or Revelation? We need to understand the context of prophecy instead of assuming we can read it no differently than we read a news article or something like that. I wouldn't want you to ignore...

You continue to make yourself look bad by frequently making false claims towards others. He does not deny that Matthew 24:30-31 refers to the literal, visible second coming of Christ. And never has. Don't make claims like this towards someone without even knowing how they interpret a given...

LOL. Not in any that refer to a prophecy that was to be fulfilled within a certain time period. The prophecy itself indicates that certain things would occur during a continuous 490 year time period and it lists six things that would be fulfilled by the end of that time period. There is no...

Please refrain from using God's name in vain on a Christian forum. You are unbelievably immature. Are you a child? Why would you question that? I am a Christian and take sin seriously. I believe lying is a sin. I'm not going to lie about something like that. Why would I? LOL. Look at how many...