Search results

Okay.....? And, of course, I am convinced that I hold the trump card. Whatever. Can't we just discuss these things without wasting time thinking the other is being dishonest with the scripture or any nonsense like that? I believe we are both trying to be honest with the scripture. So, why can't...

I'm not going to waste time debating the details of what you said here. You know I disagree with what you're saying here. But, in the context of what was being discussed, it seems that you acknowledge that Satan will be involved in the events described in Revelation 19 despite not being...

LOL. It figures that you can't even see the parallels in those 2 passages. Do you believe there are any two passages in the book of Revelation that refer to the same event or do you think every passage in the book refers to a different event? Revelation can't be properly understood without...

You have shown nothing clearly except that you have that particular belief. You have done nothing to back it up in any convincing way. And, once again, you failed to address any of my points. Do you expect to be taken seriously when you refuse to specifically address any points others make? I...

Calm down, buddy. So I misunderstood what you were saying and didn't realize you were only talking about this passage. No reason to accuse me of twisting your words when I simply misunderstood them. So, now that I realize what you're asking, the answer is no. I don't deny that passage (Matthew...

Thanks, I appreciate that. There is no indication in verse 10 as to exactly when the beast and false prophet are cast into the lake of fire in relation to what is described in the previous verses. So, they very easily could be cast there after the event described in verse 9 is over with Satan...

This is absolutely right. There is absolutely nothing in the text itself to indicate that there would be any gap at any point during the 70 weeks. So, apart from doctrinal bias, there is no reason whatsoever for someone to assert that there is a gap in the 70 weeks. There is no basis for that...

As usual, you just repeated what you believe yet again (as if we don't already know) and you didn't bother addressing anything I said. I hope one day you learn how to take part in two way discussions, but I can see that you still have not learned that.

Good for you. I don't adhere to reformed eschatology, whatever that even means. I study scripture for myself. If I happen to agree with that on some things, so be it. Do you ever tire of saying the exact same things over and over again year after year? I've never seen anything like it. Why are...

Why do you focus on that instead of the verse referring to by far the most significant part of the 70th week which was our Great God and Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, sacrificing Himself for the sins of the world and thereby confirming and establishing the new covenant while effectually making...

LOL. I agree with preterists in their interpretation of some things and I agree with futurists like you in your interpretations of other things. But, somehow you want to equate people like me with preterists. Ridiculous. You are making the false assumption that everyone has to be labeled either...

You equate someone disagreeing with you with not being open about these things. You are coming across as being very confident that you are correct about these things. Does that mean you are not open to correction and can't be wrong? I doubt you would say that. So, why is that the case for those...

They did cease to have any meaning once Christ made His once for all sacrifice. How can you, as a Christian, not recognize that? You should have more discernment than this. How can Israel finish its own transgression? Only Jesus could do that for them. Daniel 9 is all about Jesus but you make...

Why does it have to include Satan? There are parallel passages in the book of Revelation that speak of the same events and they don't all give the same details regarding those events. Premils like you miss that. Do you believe the following passages are referring to the same battle? Revelation...

Just because the beast and false prophet are cast into the lake of fire before Satan does not mean Satan can't be cast there soon after them. It's only your assumption that what is described in Revelation 20 chronologically follows what is described in Revelation 19 that leads you to believe...

Such a convincing argument that you made here. Great job, Jay.

They can never answer that question. They like to throw the term "replacement theology" around, but are not able to tell us who or what is supposedly being replaced and who or what is replacing them.

Yes, all Israel will be saved. But, which Israel? Romans 9:6 It is not as though God’s word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel. 7 Nor because they are his descendants are they all Abraham’s children. On the contrary, “It is through Isaac that your offspring will be...

Amen. It boggles my mind that any Christian would not recognize that Daniel 9:27 is talking about Jesus confirming the new covenant and that the reference to Him causing the sacrifices and offerings to cease has to do with the fact that His death brought about the end of the old covenant animal...

Wrong. I know what you meant and I responded accordingly. It is a lie that "no one wants to be objective about anything" in relation to the topic at hand. I was not understanding you to be talking about no one being objective about literally anything. I already know that this is what you meant...