Search results

You're not getting it. Of course the blood of bulls never took away sins. But, the old covenant animal sacrifices were REQUIRED by God up until Jesus made His once for all sacrifice. After that, they CEASED to be required. That's what the prophecy is about. Making claims like this is pointless...

Nice job of illustrating just how nonsensical his view of the 70 weeks as being 490 literal days really is. And you ask a good question here that I can't really answer. I don't know why I bother wasting time refuting something that only he believes. There's really no point in doing that. It's...

I do. Thanks. What are you talking about? Can you try being specific so I don't have to guess as to what you're talking about here? I hope I'm not asking too much. What exactly am I preaching that I'm supposedly not practicing?

Daniel 9:25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. 26 And after...

The same Holy Spirit who inspired Paul to write about the last trumpet inspired John to write about the 7th trumpet. So, even if it wasn't revealed to Paul at the time he was writing, the Holy Spirit knew what the last trumpet referred to. The last prophetic trumpet to sound. And that will be...

So, for the sake of clarification, would you agree that all dead OT saints as well as all dead NT saints are included in the group that Paul called "the dead in Christ"?

You don't have to say it. Do you know what a 490 year continuous time period means? It means no gaps. But, you add a huge gap to the prophecy. You have so much trouble understanding what is being talked about here. I think you are in over your head here. It already was completed. There is no...

Am I asking to much for you to tell me which post you're talking about here? I have responded to many of your posts, but you foolishly think I'm ignoring one of them for some inexplicable reason? What is wrong with you?

How can I not see what in what way exactly? What is wrong with you? Seriously. You're coming across as unhinged here. I respond to many posts and you know darn well I don't ignore posts. So, which post are you talking about? Maybe I missed it. The posts are coming fast and furious on here and I...

I didn't say that you said he was right. Good grief. Just stay out of that particular discussion if you can't understand what is being discussed. I wasn't mentioning you. Goodness sakes. I was talking to Truth7t7 when I said what I did and you decided to respond to what I said to him. I have...

Honestly, I couldn't care less about that. All that means is that I disagree with your interpretation of that verse. But, my particular interpretation does not put a gap in the 70 weeks because it doesn't include "the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate" as being...

Because you're denying that an obvious prophecy (Genesis 3:15) is prophecy. That's what Genesis 3:15 does. LOL! I have responded to many posts and here you are complaining that I haven't responded to one particular post yet? You have to be kidding me. Maybe I missed it. Which post are you...

No, it isn't. You are adding to scripture. There is no indication that the prophecy in Daniel 9 would extend beyond a continuous 70 week/490 year time period. There was an allotted time period, 490 years, by the end of which the prophecy in Daniel 9:24-27 would be fulfilled. In particular, the...

That isn't what I was talking about. I left out a detail in my post that I should have included there, so it would be more clear as to what I was talking about. I edited that post to make it more clear (post #191). What I was referring to was Truth7t7's claim that the part in Daniel 9:26 that...

Yet, somehow, you don't believe any of Matthew 24-25 or any of Mark 13 is about 70 AD. How do you explain that in light of what you said here?

Why do you resort to dishonesty? Did I deny that Jesus ever spoke of His body as a temple? No. Yes, He spoke of that and He also spoke of the destruction of the physical temple which was standing at the time. Why do you not allow that He could have spoken about both? That's ludicrous. The...

Why are you being so dishonest here? Had Genesis 3:15 been fulfilled yet when it was written? Obviously not. It talks about something that would happen in the future. You know what that's called? Prophecy. But, here you are denying that.

Yep, that's straight out of the Dispensational Futurism Version (DPV). They're always changing scripture to fit their view. The prophecy indicates that there would be a 70 week period of time, which most of us understand as being 490 years, by the end of which the things listed in that verse...

It's not pride to call someone out for missing something that every Christian should easily recognize, which is that the reference to the Messiah being cut off in Daniel 9:26 is a reference to Jesus's death.. He was denying that. How can any Christian not recognize that passage as speaking about...

Stop lying. It is a sin to lie. I do not put a gap into Daniel's 70 weeks. You are falsely representing my view. Are you so lacking in confidence in your own view that you have to resort to lying about my view? Pathetic.