Search results

No, I didn't say that at all. Please read what I'm saying more carefully. Are you a speed reader or something? Take your time so you stop constantly misreading what I'm saying.

LOL. It says it is "a spiritual BODY", so it's a BODY. And it will be spiritual rather than natural, as Paul indicated. A natural body is perishable/mortal but a spiritual body is imperishable/immortal. Why would you ask me this when I gave no indication whatsoever that I was saying the...

Who are you talking to? Anyone in particular? What is the context of your questions?

Do you have an issue with that statement? Is that not exactly what passages like the following indicate: Colossians 2:12 having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through your faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead. 13 When you were dead...

Here is how Paul describes it: 1 Corinthians 15:42 So will it be with the resurrection of the dead. The body that is sown is perishable, it is raised imperishable; 43 it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; 44 it is sown a natural body, it...

Did you even read my post? If you did, you wouldn't ask me this question because you would already know my answer based on what I already said. Can you please address what I said?

I did not say that. Please take more time to read what I actually say so that you don't misrepresent what I said.

Can you please address what I said first before asking these questions? I will respond to this once you actually address what I said in my post first.

I believe you are badly misinterpreting this verse. In no way, shape or form is that saying there are two parts to the first resurrection. The first thing you're getting wrong is interpreting "Christ the firstfruits" as the church. That is not at all what it means. You're not looking at the...

Of course I'm not saying that. Why would you ask such a dumb question? It's only your comments that are pointless. You asked a ridiculous question about what I was saying as if there would be any possibility that I would say something stupid like saying that "unbelievers will be made righteous...

Revelation 12:17 is not parallel to Luke 21:20-24. Satan's wrath against Christians would not ever be described as "the time of punishment" like we see here: Luke 21:20 “When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near. 21 Then let those who are in...

No, it does not. You falsely believe that a future resurrection is the first resurrection when scripture teaches that Jesus Christ's resurrection was the first resurrection. You do not interpret scripture with scripture and that is why you believe many things that are false. Acts 26:23 that...

Well, why didn't you make that clear in the first place? You gave the impression that it is nations being judged. Ugh. What does this mean? The passage indicates that the sheep (the righteous) inherit "eternal life" in "the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world" at that...

I have to stop you right here. It seems that you are overlooking the first question they asked, which was "when shall these things be?". What were "these things" that they were talking about if not the temple buildings standing at that time? How does it make any sense to conclude that they were...

That, of course, was written before His first coming. Jesus Himself said that all authority in heaven and on earth was given to Him before He ascended to heaven. You just want to ignore that. He rules in the hearts of His followers and nothing on earth can happen without His permission. Your...

This is what you said in response to this: How exactly does what you said have anything to do with what I had said?

Where in that text does it say anything about the souls John saw being "united with a new physical body"? Read verse 6 there. At what point is it the case that the second death has no power over someone? Not until they are bodily resurrected? Or some time before that? The answer to the first...

You need to teach this to yourself. You don't need to tell me about spiritual things. You are clearly the one with the carnal mind. Everyone here can see your extreme lack of spiritual discernment. Anyone who tries to say that being "in Jesus" is different than being "in Christ" is clearly not...

LOL. So what? He was always the Christ whether people knew it or not. You are trying to make things up that aren't taught in scripture anywhere just to keep your doctrine afloat. It's pathetic. Stick with what scripture teaches instead of making up nonsense from your imagination such as saying...

I would never want you to. You didn't answer my question as to why you misquoted me. Do you think it's okay to use dishonest tactics like that when debating? He is king over all the earth NOW. Looks like you need someone to study FOR YOU, since your own studies are very lacking. Matthew 28:18...