Search results

You seem to take almost everything literally. Even in highly symbolic books like Daniel and Revelation. So, how was it that you came to understand that the thousand years isn't literal? It seems like a miracle that you were able to recognize that considering that you seemingly are not able to...

So, that should be something that concerns you and something you should want to do something about. Animal sacrifices? This is such a cop out. Why won't you just admit that you have no answers and can't support your view with scripture? Why is it so hard for you to be honest? So, are you saying...

What is wrong with you? Why will you not accept what I tell you about what I believe? I have told you several times now that I do NOT believe that all of Matthew 24 is fulfilled. Only Matthew 24:15-22. So, that is different than what partial preterists believe. Also, I do NOT believe that all of...

Why don't you address the scriptures shared in post #17 instead of asking this ridiculous question? The scriptures shared in that post indicate that there is one day in the future when all of the dead will be resurrected and one day in the future when all people will be judged. So, please...

We're not? Then why did John say that we are? Revelation 1:5 and from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth.To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood, 6 and has made us to be a kingdom and priests to...

You are misapplying all of those scriptures. Isaiah 65:21 and Isaiah 66:22-23 both relate to the new heavens and new earth, not the thousand years. Micah 4:3 relates to "the last days" (see Micah 4:1), not a thousand year time period after Christ's return as you believe. The last days cover the...

LOL

Are you purposely just being a clown and playing games here or are you just ignorant? Of course I'm not saying that the woman is also the beast. No one in their right mind would say that. Don't be so ridiculous. Do you want to be taken seriously? If you do then stop asking ridiculous questions...

You don't think it matters that you can't provide any other scripture to support your interpretation of Revelation 20? So, everything else has to be understood in light of Revelation 20 instead of Revelation 20 being understood in light of other scripture? Where? I particularly am interested in...

Of what? I'm pretty sure you are wrong about almost everything (if not everything) when it comes to eschatology. That's too bad that you've taught false doctrine for that long. LOL. Please. I don't know who you're talking about, but he has nothing on Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter, Paul, Jude...

He has clearly not done any research whatsoever on the subject of this thread, so it is impossible for him to engage the subject. So, what does he do instead? He tries to derail the thread.

What is the context of 1 Thessalonians 5:9? That can be seen from what Paul said earlier in the chapter. 1 Thess 5:1 Now, brothers and sisters, about times and dates we do not need to write to you, 2 for you know very well that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. 3 While...

Whose resurrection was it that scripture teaches was the first resurrection? Acts 26:23 that the Messiah would suffer and, as the first to rise from the dead, would bring the message of light to his own people and to the Gentiles.” The first resurrection is Jesus Christ's resurrection. That is...

Exactly. It also talks about him being chained up. How exactly can a spirit being be literally chained up in a bottomless pit? It's obviously figurative text being used there, but for some reason Premils insist on taking it all literally.

I remember that you were Premil, then you became what you called agnosmillennialist or something like that and then you seemingly became Premil again. So, when did you decide not to be Premil anymore (again)? How can you believe that the new heavens and new earth will be ushered in at the return...

Right. Notice Jesus pointed out that it "destroyed them all" and then indicated that is how "it will be in the day when the Son of man is revealed". The context of His second coming is that it's a global event, so what He was saying there (and in Matthew 24:37-39) is that He will be destroying...

2 Peter 3:10-12 is talking about the burning up of the heavens, elements and the earth and then verse 13 refers to the result of that renewal by fire which will be the new heavens and new earth. 2 Peter 3:13 But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth...

No, you're just proving that you are unable to recognize the parallels within the book of Revelation. With your ridiculous literal and chronological approach to interpreting the book, you have the final wrath of God coming down several different times. And you apparently couldn't care less that...

If the thousand years represent eternity, then how can Satan's little season follow it? It very clearly indicates that the thousand years will end and Satan's little season will follow that, but you don't seem to even acknowledge that for some reason. Why is that? Revelation 20:3 He threw him...

It just means not a literal thousand years. Nice try with yet another weak argument. Your arguments are a joke. You are just embarrassing yourself at this point with this nonsense.