Search results

Loaded language? What does that mean? I had asked this in reference to the animal sacrifices that you believe will be performed in the future: Why would there be nothing in scripture stating what their purpose would be? Is this question too difficult? I don't believe so. Do you just not want...

Okay, you're a child who is incapable of having an adult discussion. I get it. Sorry to bother you. Please go back to playing with your toys.

How could such a temple be something that Paul would call "the temple of God"? Please answer this question instead of just repeating yourself yet again. You said yourself that this temple you believe will be built in the future wouldn't be one that God would approve of, right? So, how can it be...

Partial preterists don't believe that Matthew 24:29-30 is referring to a future second coming of Christ, so you have no idea of what you're talking about. Learn what partial preterists believe first before you accuse me of being one. Don't be so ignorant. They also don't believe that Revelation...

This is a very serious allegation to accuse someone of not believing God's promises. Tell us which of God's promises exactly that WPM doesn't believe in and use scripture to show what you're talking about.

And what is what Paul is saying in Colossians 2:14. You are trying to twist it to mean something entirely different because of doctrinal bias and no other reason.

Were my questions too difficult for you to answer? Is this your way of trying to get out of answering my questions?

Is there only one Israel? Paul taught otherwise in Romans 9:6-8. You have the wrong Israel in mind. WPM showed you this and you apparently ignored everything he said.

Please. This is a lame argument and you know it. If you read about God's promises to Abraham and his seed it definitely gives the impression that it's talking about Abraham's natural descendants rather than his spiritual descendants. How can you deny this? Convince me of what? You need to be...

If you can't find any scripture to support your interpretation of Revelation 20 and your belief that two separate kingdoms will be inherited at Christ's return (the one Paul referenced in 1 Cor 15:50 and some other one), then you should reconsider your interpretation of Revelation 20. Simple.

There are also Old Testament passages that speak about God's promises that He made to Abraham and his seed. If we didn't have the NT we would assume that those promises applied to Abraham and his natural descendants of the nation of Israel, but Paul made it clear that the promises were made to...

Why would there be nothing in scripture stating what their purpose would be? Do you think that makes any sense? Be honest. Do you believe the following passage is referring to the animal sacrifices and offerings that you believe will be performed in the future? Ezekiel 45:15 Also one sheep is...

Well, there you go. If you don't THINK it contradicts Premil then it doesn't and that's that. You have really low standards for what is necessary to defend your doctrine. You just have to think it's true and that's enough. Who cares if you can back it up with scripture or not, right? Wow. It...

What are you trying to say here, that we should still be following all 613 commandments of the old covenant law? Do you think the old covenant law is still in effect?

That was before He made His "once for all" sacrifice. Do you think He was insulted by them after His death? You better believe He was. If you don't think so, then that would mean you have no discernment whatsoever. Because He already made the "once for all" sacrifice Himself that ended the need...

Some people here just blatantly twist scripture to fit their doctrine. Do these people not have a conscience? Do they think that God can't see what they're doing? It's unbelievable.

Colossians 2:14 says nothing about sins. How would sins be equated with certificates of debt? That's not what Paul was doing there. No, you are the one who needs to study this more. Christ's death put an end to the need for the Jews to follow the ordinances of the old covenant law. Those...

Which promises are you referring to exactly?

That verse (2 Thess 2:4) is not talking about an individual man of sin, but rather sinful mankind in general. Do you think the following is talking about an individual man of God? 2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for...

You have proven to be delusional in your belief that some useless temple built in the future could possibly be considered "the temple of God". It would be more like the temple of Satan if such a temple is actually built. It certainly wouldn't be a temple that Paul or John would have called "the...