Search results

Acts 2:38. It was the one and only plan of salvation. Read it and obey to enter into the original Church. Ignore it and stay in the counterfeit Church.

Is that how you attempt to explain away the God that Jesus describes that he has in Rev 3:12? What is your explanation for this in John 20?.... ....I go to your Father and my Father, to your God and my God....

You quoted a verse that was written to those already saved per Acts 2:38. You skipped Acts and attempted to find a new plan of salvation in the epistles to the saints. Bad idea

12 Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name. Is...

His new name cancels out his God as he mentions it 4 times? Please elaborate how he misspoke.(are you sure his God did not give him a new name?)

I don't care if one baptizes oneself in the bath tub in the name of Jesus Christ. Just do it in case it is for the remission of sins(and Peter was correct at Pentecost).

...as we reason away water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of our sins per Acts 2:38. How dare Peter say such a thing at Pentecost. The nerve of that man.

Here is the simple context. Baptism doth also now save us.....(so, those that say it does not save us are debunked by the Bible. ) Not the putting away of the filth of the flesh...,(bath) But an answer of a clean conscience towards God....(remission of sins removes guilt). This is the very...

They “believed into the body of Christ “ there? Have you seen how the 3000 in Acts 2 were added to the Church without the Holy Ghost, but only baptism? Baptism is unnecessary?

Yes everything changed after the resurrection. John baptized unto repentance. Peter etc. baptized repented souls in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins. Question. Why did you skip Acts 2:38? Did you know the Church began in Acts 2, not Acts 10?

Let’s talk about the 1st question. In Rev. 3:12 Jesus, in heaven speaks of his God 4 times in this single verse. Do you agree with his open admission of having a God? If not, why not?

Okay, but do you think Jesus has a God right now? Also, do you think that the Father is actually Jesus himself?

Did you read my statement of belief yet?

Absolutely. Now, we are taught that God turned into a human, put on flesh, enrobed Himself in flesh, took on a human nature etc. All I see is God's spoken word that made everything else in verse 3, made flesh in verse 14. .... 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing...

My belief.... Jesus preexisted as a human in the mind of God, which is reality since there is no time in God. (Psalm 2, Psalm 22, Rev 13:8) Jesus was born before Adam and any living thing.(Col 1). Jesus resurrected before Lazarus etc.(Col 1). God made all things by, through and for Jesus(Col...

Okay let’s take a step back. Please explain in a nutshell what you teach, since you are not oneness or trinity. I can easily sum up what I think in a few short sentences if you want me to. Thanks

So, the Book of Revelation of Jesus Christ for instance, is really about the past experiences of God being revealed in future times? If this is what you mean it makes sense. God transcends time.

Jesus said he has a soul.(in Gethsemane) Jesus said he has a human spirit.(at the cross) Jesus was made microscopic.(at conception) Read your Bible.

God only made his flesh? Did it have a soul and human spirit? Was he made a full grown flesh or a microscopic cell?