Search results

I could be wrong but I’m pretty sure you said all bibles are corrupt.

The second time was the resurrection.

Ok but many days doesn’t point to long or short period of time, it could be either. Soon points to something close and 2000 years in the future would not be soon.

Can you give examples?

None of that comes from the Bible — it comes from dispensational tradition. Paul never names the restrainer, never says anything gets removed. The temple is your bigger problem. You already granted that the man of sin can't be sitting in a believer's body — but that's the only temple of God the...

The "den" or temple was their safe-haven and yes they were robbers and thieves but that' not why they were cast out. They were cast out because the temple was a place of worship, not a market place.

Now I see why you're so far out in left field. You have have no standard to base truth on so truth is whatever you want it to be.

It's a sin to "make my Father's house an house of merchandise."

You're right that He said robbers and not sellers. But look at where the phrase comes from — He's quoting Jeremiah 7:11, and that changes what it means. Jeremiah 7:9-11: "Will ye steal, murder, and commit adultery, and swear falsely, and burn incense unto Baal, and walk after other gods whom ye...

Notice that Matthew 21:12 says Jesus "cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple" — not just the ones who were cheating. He didn't pull aside the honest merchants and let them stay. He drove them all out. Why? Because John's account gives us the clearest statement of the charge. In...

They all knew Trump would win, it was the plan for Trump to win. Look Ziggy, in occult numerology, which these people follow and believe in, they made Trump the 45th and 47th president ON PURPOSE. 45th president 4 + 5 = 9 47th 4 = 7 =11. Trump is doing the REAL 9/11 on this country right now...

It wouldn't have been any different had they been selling gospel tracts, Jesus still would've been angry because they were making money off of the things of God.

The principle underneath wasn't about the *item being sold*—it was about turning God's house into a place of profit and exploitation. In Matthew 23:13-14, Jesus condemns the scribes and Pharisees for devouring widows' houses and making long prayers for a pretense. They were selling something...

Those who engage in merchandising the gospel, exploiting others for gain, trafficking in false doctrine for profit—they are the ones with the mark. They are free to buy and sell because they've rejected the principle of God's house. But true saints? They cannot buy and sell in that way. Jesus...

See my reply to David in NJ post 327.

I have to push back hard on that one, Crow. That is not God's plan and it's not written in the bible. Your belief system affiliates the temple of God with the kabbalistic temple. The temple of God is the believer, and you can't just say "it's God's written plan" so that it lines up with your...

You're saying the naos is believers' bodies. Then what is the altar? What is the outer court given to the Gentiles? And what would it even mean for Gentiles to trample the body of a believer? Separate question on verse 2, where do you get the idea that the heavenly Jerusalem can be trodden...

Check what? I can’t read your mind.

Let me state this more plainly, because I don't think I've made it clear. The temple in verse 1 is the literal temple in Jerusalem — the one standing when John wrote, and the one destroyed in AD 70. Not a symbol, not the church, not a future rebuilt structure. That's why John can measure it and...

Here's what I said. I was saying: - The temple in Rev 11 has to be *literal* (earthly Jerusalem) - It was destroyed and replaced by the true temple (believers' bodies) and heavenly Jerusalem - This proves Rev 11 is about the past, not future