Search results

No No, that is just how you see it according to you own understanding. But rather, as it is written, I declare according to "all truth."

Quit dodging the obvious. I literally stated the same answer as you did, in the post you replied to, and you now deny it. Well you quoted me, so YOU ARE WRONG. And if I did not provide every scripture--so what? The truth needs quoted nothing to be true. Did you know that? Sure you did--but you...

That's a lie. And something you wouldn't even know.

No...we've been at this a long time, and I have answered all that and more. And no, God takes me seriously enough to choose me and send me...for more than you know.

:( You keep saying "the plain text of scripture." --There is no plain text of scripture. That is literary nonsense! What do the scriptures say? They don't say "plain text"--they say "all language" is "confused", "is spirit" and must be "spiritually discerned." Meanwhile, you act like you've...

Errorred teachings of men. :(

No need entertain your misgivings, but perhaps good to take opportunity, incidentally: The "physical return of Jesus" is limited to He "has come in the flesh" meaning (according to the scriptures) His coming into those who hear Him knocking and open and let Him in...into His body (flesh). Which...

Well YOU ARE WRONG on much of that, but I am traveling and will have to address each point (AGAIN) later. Don't hold your breath. Meanwhile, the short answer is--not all of what YOU HAVE ACCUSED ME OF--but all of what I have claimed is biblical and anything is possible with God, even things you...

That is a lie.

That is a lie.

Strike the match!

You'll see. You just don't have the final say. How do I know? Because it has been given to me.

Yeah, that's not going to go well! Imagine, someone putting the prophets of God or Jesus--or even a donkey--on "Ignore." --Oh yeah, that's what many did with them too!

Your accessment is wrong, but it is a good observation. Think about it. If "all language" were "confused" but used as is...in order to understand what is really true, the words would have to be UNtwisted. Yes...and in order to receive "all truth" you should EXPECT it. Meaning you are really close!

Not at all, but a warning based upon the character of God. Because your points of defining how God communicates, are completely opposite of how He has communicated all throughout the scriptures.

You just described many of the legitimate prophets and Jesus. That says a lot...not about me, but about YOU.

So, being tasked by God...you think one should not be forthright? Wow! Well, that's impressive, good luck with that.

Is God not invisible? Does He not speak in parables and even literally beat around a burning bush, rather than just show Himself and get to the point instead of only revealing here a little there a little? And those He truly sends and speaks through--if they were any different--would you...

My question wasn't so crazy heh? After all you answered it. And that was why I asked...so that you would reveal your error and misunderstanding, and you have. Good, because it gives you the chance to see the problem. So...I challenge you. Name any tribulation more "great" than the tribulation...

Don't blame me--you didn't go in circles or even forward, but backwards! You quoted and claimed Matthew 16:12 which identifies the leaven that Jesus spoke of as meaning "doctrine"--well what did you think--that the words were not spirit? Did you think or believe that their interactions were...