Search results

Oh, but I have. Perhaps not to you personally...because you--not the scriptures--demand "proof" as do atheists and an evil generation. And you who claim to know the scriptures wonder why.

7 years after Putin and Trump met in Helsinki, Finland at the official Adidas World Cup where Putin gave the match ball to Trump saying, the "ball is in your court"...a statement of greater political significance. The earthquake, defined as a "reverse" shift, was an act of God.

That "fire" is holy fire (spirit), not a "physical" return.

There is no "physical" return of Christ (except within the physical bodies of those hear His knock and open the door to Him in spirit). Just read Matthew 24.

The point was that the "as one man" teachings in the scriptures, identifies "the man of sin" (revealed).

I said your half-quote, half-premise was a lie. That's what half-truths are, that's what Satan also did.

Indeed, the words that I speak do show what kind of teacher I am. But "backwards" is a matter of perspective. Go figure the Priests and Pharisees even thought Jesus was a false teacher. I was right to group you with them.

You are not "rightly handling the word of truth." And your false accusations are just you projecting...and it's going to cost you.

That is NOT what I said. Typical that you would twist it and falsely accuse me.

No, I dodge your false accusations, and put them back in your face, that YOU should be fully exposed. That is the flip side of truth from God, both promises of God are fulfilled, and the wicked are also revealed.

You describe a biblical scenario...and put yourself on the wrong side lfhclfhhlf

Deadreconning is a sailing term where if you are off by even the smallest amount, you could be off course by miles. In other words, if what you believe is true came from the teachings of men and their interpretations--if they were wrong--so are you. And if it all just makes sense to YOU, that's...

So...you were never a man of sin revealed as every man is--am I speaking with Jesus?

That is a lie. ...and it's quite enough. So shall it be bound and written.

That's fine. Just get in line here behind the Pharisees ->

Amen to that!

All that I have said can and does withstand the written Word. It just doesn't agree with what you believe to be true. Big difference. Which, indeed is a doctrinal issue--your's.

That is not the biblical method, but a method also demanded by atheists and an evil generation.

Again, no...your measure is merely your own understanding of God’s Word.

No, you are comparing my statements to your understanding of the scriptures. Even as if you think or believe that everything needs to be a quote verbatim. But that's not biblical.