Search results

No, you have not presented the truth. But I leave you to your folly.

Fine then, I leave you to it.

You have not even accepted the correct definition of Preterism. So it doesn't surprise me that you would also not accept the truth. As for "still future"--that is the "lie." Now you know and are accountable.

Yes, and this has been the stumbling block for many. But it is spiritual language. What did Christ pay, taxes or the penalty for salvation for all mankind? Both. But men have only considered the language of Revelation to mean buy and sell worldly commerce. And boils...what is a boil but an...

You and most of Christendom. The "lie" and cause of "strong delusion" perpetrated by the "false teachers" of the early church, spoken of by Peter...was and still is the timing and the manner by which Jesus would return. He said, "soon" and "quickly" , saying "Behold, I stand at the door and...

That is a good assumption. The passage and reference of the mark of the beast, refers to we who are in the valley of decision (on earth) when God pours out His spirit upon all flesh. In times past, before Pentecost, the valley of decision (where our freewill eternal fate decision is revealed)...

No.

The first part is correct--but after the "BUT" most of that is merely the man-made doctrine handed down from the "false teachers" spoken by Peter, who by leaning on their own understanding were snared by the language confused by God to hide the truth from them. Unfortunately, as Paul wrote...

Far from perfect.

The point of asking the three questions I asked, is that they all are defined as having eternal life, meaning nothing can harm them ever again. "It is finished." But most simply do not understand what it all means--what the mark of the beast is--and try to imagine what it might be, usually as...

Tomorrow is not the right day.

I read parts 1 and 2, but am going to stop there for now, because as much as you said that is correct--and much is--there are a few things somewhat against what is actually true: The singular false messiah: The reason there would seem to be both many and also a singular description, is that...

Because we too were once enemies of God.

tsml

Jack, I know that you have been emotionally impacted a thousand times over on this issue...so this is hard. But you are stuck in a worldly perspective and interpretation of scripture which gives worldly scenarios as examples for training purposes only--not to be believed regarding their...

Paul says it well, that "since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead." Meaning, every person subject to God's creation has what they need to choose their eternal fate even without...

Jack, Do you believe that there were to be false Christs? Would you fall at the feet of anyone with the name Jesus? Why then do you not also allow for an explanation that there is also a false Israel, as it is written? Oh, and your quotes above show you wrong, because it says God "has" visited...

I know you called for historians, which I am not--I love history, it's just that it's worldly so I don't refer to it for what is actually true--but I have it from a greater authority, that Luke is correct.

If you'd like, we can explore: The theological debate on perseverance vs. eternal security during end-times scenarios How different Christian traditions interpret the nature of the Mark of the Beast Let me know which angle you want to break down further.

"If" is a big word in this case. "If" you had understood, you would know I have answered already. "If" one is born of God they are one with God, and therefore would never take the mark of the beast. But do you understand that is after-the-fact?