Search results

I don't know about Vlad the Impaler, but I am good with reeducating Christian men who have for so long been feminized by society and even within the church.

I concur. This is war. Lay down your weapons when it is over, not before. Which is not living by the sword, it's not dying by the sword.

Your point stands with you, it is you. That is the point of the parable: some stand at one point, and others at another, some with more, some with less. That's how this works: God sets before us all "life and death, blessing and cursing", and we all individually have to choose where we...

It is...but it doesn't say "water."

It is not for you to decide, nor apparently, even to know. Either way--that is how God operates, that is His method. Like I said--you don't have to like it or believe it--but He has established it as such. Meanwhile, you are not just rejecting me, but Him who sent me. That's how this works.

You are so wrong I need to stop you right there. On the contrary--God commands us to separate His words! He has set before us all, "life and death, blessing and cursing", which we are to be found "rightly dividing."

You are close, but have not put it together. The difference that you are not accounting for is "but each one in his own order." Indeed, you are correct to say that there is only one crop--but when I have said that to many here, explaining that the difference is the eternal (timeless...

Answer the question.

I know that is the perspective of you and others, but it is because you do not understand. Paul was all things to all people, because he brought the opening message to many nations. Do you not see the correlation? But that is not where we are now, and you have not perceived that the wrap up is...

The conversation is mine...and thanks for the compliment--during such times, it's good to be an outcast.

Thanks, I'm not much found of timelines, but links in scripture are always good to consider.

Thank you--good work! I would contrast the parable of the sower with regards to the three (or four) different gospel accounts in this way: Matthew's account depicting the "falling away" as it has been said, "it is always darkest just before the day dawn." "And because lawlessness will abound...

keep reading, you too have missed the point.

"So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman but of the free." Galatians 4:31

I agree, however the fruits of the Spirit if fully followed, include those of Him who was and is firstfruits of the Spirit. Which is to say, love is first, by all means, and is to be exhausted before, and hopefully, prayerfully, never to come to the righteous wall that we also need to uphold.

Not my own--I have told you that already. But tell me, Is there no biblical exception to what you have accuse me of? What would have to be, for it to be biblically correct for a person to make declarations as I have? Hint: bdavidc said it--but rejected it, resorting rather to continued...

Your use and reference to the parable of the sower is natural, because you stopped at the math or numbers of the planting phase, as if we all just fade into the sunset spreading that seed--as if the words meant nothing more. While my point was that everything Jesus did that we should participate...

That surprises you? On the contrary, I addressed the issue in spite of your request. I explained that the foundation, while true at that level, is not the finished work of God. Why should I not bring us up to speed regarding those things that were to be fulfilled during these present times...

I am not going to continue going back and forth with you until you can acknowledge that God alone is sovereign over His own word. Which you have rejected now in two different threads. In the other thread you justified Paul for writing by the Holy Spirit--well here it's me doing the same whether...

No again--that is not true. Your understanding of how context works is incorrect. That is how those who practice exegesis define it too--and they are wrong too. I gave you the scriptures where Jesus did not do what you describe about "establishing what the passage means"--and you rejected it...