Search results

Yes: sex=marriage

NO

So, do you really think numbers serve as justification? The MAJORITY is generally wrong on everything all the time. "Few there be that find it" ain't the majority.

It's not for Christians

The bible gives clear warning in both the OT and NT about the danger of adding to or taking away from God's Word. Is the 'did ache' a supplement to God's Word? Yes or no! If yes, it violates God's very clear and stern warning against against adding to his word. You decide. Believe whatever...

All it takes is a clear understanding of scripture to see the fallacy in infant baptism. 1. No record of any infant being baptized in the scriptures 2. Infants can't satisfy the basic, simple requirements and prerequisites of being baptized. Baptism is not the 1st thing done according to...

Your response is a joke and doesn't merit a response.

And the word "baptism", is self explanatory. One simply needs to look up its Greek origin and definition, and upon doing so, it'll be clear that it means to dip, plunge, immerse, and not sprinkle or pour which are different Greek words and are not interchangeable with 'baptizo'.

Blah, blah, blah. Just words with no scriptural support or validation. Once again there is NO scriptural support for infant baptism. Infants have NOT committed sin, cannot believe, nor confess with their mouths their belief if they had such as required by scripture.

Agree. No such thing in the scriptures as infant baptism nor does it make any sense whatsoever. Man contrived nonsense.

As I just said to someone else, prayer is NOT one of the miraculous manifestations of the Spirit listed in 1 Cor 12:8-10

There are no miracle workers through which God channels his power. The gifts in NT biblical times were passed on and made manifest by the laying on of the apostle's hands, and they are all dead. Here's something I've posted previously. REPOST Stephen was already a baptized believer, so...

Words. Blah, blah, blah etc

What was Paul's thorn in the flesh as he claimed he was plagued with in 2 Cor 12:8 and "besought the Lord thrice" (3 times) to rid him of it? Some say (erroneously), it was an affliction of some kind. However, when you look carefully at the text, it's clear to see it was not a bodily disorder...

Don't confuse prayer with the the miraculous gifts listed in 1 Cor 12:8-10. Prayer is not a gift nor one listed there as such. And yes, baloney is obviously what you believe based on more baloney.

Miraculously inspired knowledge has

All the miraculous gifts have ceased a long time ago

That passage doesn't say anything at all about when. You're assuming when.

What you've quoted is irrelevant as relates to the discussion of 1 Cor 13:8

It's not about the world to come. Nowhere does it say that You're assuming that but that's not what it says anywhere within it.