Search results

The apostle Paul may have been called a mystic, for having expressed of his experience with God, saying "I don't know." But I have told you I do know--and therefore there is no mystery to suggest mysticism. You are mistaken...and you are not listening. Strike three.

That is not true--not according to the scriptures themselves. And no, I did not say that--I said written on parchment. Are you trying to be a false witness? Because so far you are one. And you are showing a great lack of comprehension ability-- I have also explained that what I have been...

"Mystic" is not the word. Strike two.

Matthias, you have hitched your cart to a good wagon, but do be careful with accusations. Call me a donkey or call me a king, but a "mystic" is not advisable. Meanwhile, you should know that what was written but sealed was also to be revealed, and also what God's methods are for revealing things.

God elsewhere speaks out of a cloud, or just in a voice that was heard, through angels, and sometimes with special effects. He's God.

The thing is, it's not a technical matter. Not even a physical matter, but spiritual. Moses seeing with eyes of flesh, did not see God, for got is spirit. What did Moses see then that qualified to be called God's behind? Notice I said "behind"--which spiritually does not refer to His bum. It...

Nor do I, and nor does God. God has set before all a choice between life and death, blessing and cursing. Those who are cast into outer darkness choose it...some of whom have entered into the church teachings false doctrines bringing destruction "on themselves." By whom are many victims: those...

I could have said Christendom, but the point is most Christian denominations, their leaders, and statements of faith prescribe to and even insist that Jesus returning "soon" and "all these things" that He said "must shortly come to pass" was not the truth. And I say they have rejected Him "in...

I understand, and sorry I've been on my phone and not able to state things as clearly as I might.

Thank you, apparently more clarification is needed (not that I have not publicly done so already elsewhere). @Matthias and I have exhausted many such topics, but this is good! The Church in general (officially) has indeed rejected Christ in Spirit. But many more than have rejected Christ, are...

That snow is in your own globe. You simply misunderstood and assumed what fit your narrative. And becomes of it I made clarification.

No, perhaps even very much less. But I do know that part that was given to me, but not to Paul.

I have clarified already. But understand that as stated through the lens of your limited theology, even your quotes are askew. Do you not know that if you empty yourself and only partially refill, you leave room for error?

Yes is true, but again (apparently for lack of understanding) you misrepresent what I said. Israel (for the most part, officially) rejected Christ...in the flesh. The Church (for the most part, officially) have rejected Christ...in the Spirit.

That is not a correct representation of what I said.

Then time will tell. Meanwhile the times are fulfilled by God with both revealing and restraint.

Indeed there was a local and personal context from which Paul wrote. But no, I have not wrongly chosen, but revealed what he could not fully say until the times were fulfilled. That lesser context even includes that in part he did not know. But I know.

I come to you by the Spirit of God, and you threaten me. Do what you will.

It is a good caution, but I specifically stated beyond what "is written on parchment", not what was written but sealed and not revealed during those days. And therefore I recommend you take more care not to quench the Spirit.

God is my witness.