Search results

They rejected the beginning, you now reject the end.

What is indeed incompatible, is not enduring to the end, to the complete finish of His theology.

Yes, I understand what you are getting at. But it is as I have told you, that much is "image" and not the declaration of another.

And in doing so, you have aligned yourself with their error and offense. Because you and your fellows of Israel were first.

What is it about unsealed and unfinished theology information that you do not understand as being a part of Messiah's complete theology? Is partial truth "all truth" as promised? No. And apparently all you have is part--not all. So, let it be known that you are aware of the promises of the...

There is nothing "between" when the Spirit speaks the word of Christ through those of whom He chooses. This you should know. You should also know that what you have just said is not unlike the Priest's and Pharisee's response to Jesus speaking the words of the Father. You reveal yourself. As...

Below are passages referring to the Word sealed that are part of the complete theology of Messiah that were not to be revealed and finished until the seventh angel, when he is about to sound. If what you say is true, that you "haven't missed anything that was promised"--then you should be able...

The limitation is not Messiah, but is time and this world...and you are mixing them. Messiah was "before" also, which cannot be explained away by saying He descended and ascended. On the contrary, it shows Him to be all powerful--to be God.

God is not working with people per se, but is revealing us all for what we are before the Judgment. This is our will and testament made manifest.

Here I have shared--revealed to you a word from Messiah in postdiction, but you do not hear His voice.

Tell us then...what did Daniel not write, and what did John read--of things that were written--but he did not write, and what is the promised finish of the mystery of God as He declared to His servants the prophets. Or be honest and admit that you do not know.

That is the crux of the problem. Which was only true for a time, and foretold to become "finished." This is that time. Why should you miss all that was promised? That ship has sailed...and it sank on Christmas day. Curious timing this! But you are not the Captain, why do you insist on going...

Jesus is the Light of God, in which there is no separation even if divided. Thus, yes, Light coming into the world was and is limited--but it (He) is God. A man wakes up on the wrong side of the bed and is less than himself all day. His mind is still complete and he has left nothing behind, but...

That is the logic of men from this one, worldly side of the equation: Limited and shortsighted. Is God not capable of "on earth as in heaven", or of being omnipresent--of being on both sides of anything and everything? Of course He is. But men considering the things of God impossible--Ha! What...

Okay, so what is missing here, is your not factoring in, or accepting, or believing that God can and is "on earth as in heaven." That God can be omnipresent, "all in all"...and the Son vice versa. That just limits and defines your position, and the position of monotheists, as a religious belief...

Good--that's excellent! And I am here to tell you that Jesus is that God--for He defines God--with the exception and the reason Jesus said what He said calling the Father His God, is that an "image"--that God created man as--is no God...which is also true of us as well. The dilemma and...

After all this, what are you saying, that monotheists believe Jesus is God (Emmanuel, God with us "the God of the New Testament")?

That is not an accurate depiction of what has occurred. The few that you refer to who did believe--did not believe in monotheism per se--but more importantly believed rather that Christ was God with us, against what they were taught...and died for believing what their fellow monotheists would...

Jesus was indeed the Last under the old covenant which by the law did fail to save any.

Ahh, perhaps we're getting somewhere! I understand the constraints. What I don't understand is how you could jump in in the midst of those constraints and hold to a belief that was also under constraint--like after those days, there was no tomorrow, no third day? Much of what was true, still is...