Search results

That's not the problem.

Quotable (for the record) but wrong.

No, and apparently you have a comprehension problem. I said nothing of the sort.

No, the spin is that you assumed that not all who are born of the flesh cannot inherit the kingdom of God, by making your own heartfelt exception against what the scriptures actually say.

As for the mentally handicapped, aborted babies, and the like.. As I said, the idea that they have a pass and can inherit the kingdom of God only being born of the flesh such as they are, is simply a misunderstanding. In God's reality, all who are born of the flesh are indeed condemned to...

I just gave you the biblical truth. You just responded with your own heartful but unbiblical sentiments. That is understandable, it's just not true. So you can continue to lean on your own understanding without hearing the truth...or you can listen up. Your choice.

That is not correct, as it wrongly assumes (against the scriptures) that flesh and blood can inherit the kingdom of God--which is biblically not true.

You are looking at it all wrong. The reality of all people since Adam (including babies) is not first rooted in their acts of sin, but rather in being children of sin: Those who are born out of sin, sin. That is what they/we are as children and descendants of Adam categorically, of which there...

Conjecture. Go figure.

I never said anything of the sort.

You can "leave it at that" if you choose, but it would be wrong. The error is in not fully understanding that this world is the full manifestation of good and evil...and babies are not excluded, but included. And it is this that is just, because many are the children of evil, in addition to...

Conjecture of what one only believes should be offered in the form of questions. Maybe theology is dangerous.

Many of the learned only learn the scriptures as literature, which then fails to fulfill what they thought they knew and did not.

If you are going to call names, then I suppose that makes you a name caller. Each is known by his fruit.

God is indeed just and not evil. But that does not take away the fact that all children after Adam are condemned by God to die for sin. And to campaign for the would-be innocence of children because Jesus used them as the object of comparison to the children born of the spirit of God does not...

No :( ..you are confusing works with proof by fire. The scripture refers rather to works as what one is actually made of, whether mere flesh or the spirit of God. Again, just as all things are, this is a parable. It refers to the wheat verses the chaff. And what of the blood? Is it too not a...

Jesus also spoke in parables. Did you not know that all who are born of this world are parables merely made in the image of God? What better parable then to teach that one must be born again than to refer to children? But what then...are children all born first of the spirit of God that you are...

That is not the whole of scripture, only the wishful thinking of good hearted people. The whole of scripture shows rather that one man Adam sinned creating a race of sinful people of his "kind"(--just as the young born of beasts and serpents), which unfolded from the one to be as many as are...

You are reacting as if we are all born innocent when we are not, but are born the children of sin as a fallen bloodline. You apparently have heard nothing of what God/scripture has said or what I have said. If we were all born of heaven we would all go to heaven, but we are not. How is it that...

The one does not void the other. Regarding "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me", did Christ not endure sin until death? He did, but you stating this verse would seem to assert that He was baptized and then never again came under sin afterwards, and that that is the model...