Search results

You have the biblical precedence (Acts 9:4-5), but like Paul and the Pharisees...you just can't imagine it's you. Thus, like Paul, you have been rendered blind for a time.

It is not an "ideology" but it is definitely "in the Bible." There is a name for it: "I am." How is it that you do not know this?

The struggle here in understanding properly just how all these things, these events and passages align properly, comes from having a world view rather than a godly view. Yet most wanting to put a fix on it all, gravitate to a timeline of events, completely abandoning any idea that God doesn't...

What is true, is true. If the church is true, it is true. If I am true, I am true. But error is the track record of God's people, foretold, and also in fruition; and "arrogance" has always been the accusation against those who speak the truth. History repeats both. You should have seen it...

Biblical foreknowledge is the evidence that what is now manifest was written beforehand (then made manifest by revelations).

A quote is a quote and easily verified. That's not the problem. The problem is that you are not tracking with your own posts. Here is what happened: I quoted you saying that Jesus would "permanently return to the earth." > That is not correct. > I corrected you. > Now you are lost and confused...

You do not tell me. But here you tell all and quote the same proof against your own error that you have said "Christ's permanent return to the earth." Even when you show yourself in error, you do not believe it.

Kezar has his own ideas, can't say I agree with most of them. So, No. But, I am not "trying to prove" anything. You are just wrong, so I thought I would give you the truth. Strange how some take to the truth.

You can't even say what you just said without interpreting in error. On the other hand, I didn't use my own words, but explained God's word in the manner of the Holy Spirit, rather than that of the flesh and of men whom you follow. It's that simple. "The flesh profits nothing."

Go ahead and focus on the dirt and say whatever you can against the hundreds of thousands praying for our president. But it is praying that we are suppose to be doing.

No time for a long comment...but here is the reality you are speaking against:

Open your eyes, I did not give you my opinion, I quoted the scriptures just as you asked. That was the "proof text" of your error. If we are to continue...let us do so with you seeing and confessing that you were wrong about Christ returning "to the face of the earth." Specifically, you were...

You are taking what Jesus said ("as the days of Noah") incorrectly. He did not mean that God would "correct" the world by water or by fire, but rather finish it while men perceive it not.

You are in context for revelation, but out of context for the actual truth. Your answer only defines the days in which you live in order to make such an observation. So...the question is: Will you prefer the actual event time, or when the event occurs within the revelation story timeline of...

Not true. Most prophecy doesn't work like that at all. Notice in Psalm 22:1 "My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?" followed by verse 2 "O My God, I cry in the daytime, but You do not hear; And in the night season, and am not silent." Jesus quoted just a part of the psalm, only part being...

Name one that is not fulfilled.

Just the facts ma'am.

I gave you the scriptures already, but in typical blind fashion you called me and the scriptures hogwash. Oh, and then you raddled on with your error filled worldly fulfillment interpretation of heavenly events, showing your complete lack of understanding. Impressive!

"White" has nothing to do with it. Either one accepts the fact that we hired a tough guy to do a tough job, or they are offended because they don't have a clear picture of what the real fight is about, that politics has become grossly corrupt...and in spite of Trump's character flaws, he is not...

Okay...you believe a Democratic opponent, and I believe Trump. As for Obama, he had the opportunity to seal what history had almost completely finished, but spoke for division rather than unity. You spoke of black votes in the next election...well there were scores of white voters who voted...